User talk:IchigoGa14
Welcome to the Order, IchigoGa14! |
Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki!
We hope you enjoy your stay, and we look forward to working with you! |
| Have you something to say? |
|
We seek unity, stability and order. |
|
| We wish you safety and peace on your future endeavors. Happy Editing! |
Eivor and the RPG[edit source]
Given that her having a known descendant doesn’t make sense with Valhalla stop adding that category until the game is actually out and we can make an informed decision. Continue and you will be banned. Last warning. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Roshan[edit source]
As I've said twice before in the edit notes, "bint-La'Ahad" just means "daugther of no one", it was used for orphans and those who decide to leave their families. Its use does NOT mean any relationship to Altaïr or his descendants. Please stop adding those categories to her page. - Soranin (talk) 18:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Edit disputes[edit source]
Hi Ichigo,
Again and again, you have repeatedly add in categorizations which the moderators and I have disputed and removed, especially in the recent cases of Chen Wu and the British Brotherhood, the former whose case has already been explained by Sol Pacificus. For the cause of the British Brotherhood, Britain as a "nation / state" did not exist, so it makes no sense for those Roman Hidden Ones to be considered as such. Thus, the Roman Assassins is already enough. This is your reminder not to edit war again, or you will be given a warning. Lady Kyashira (talk) 14:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- I know I am not part of the Staff, but I have observed your continual recent edit wars regarding Noa Kim's ties—or rather, the current lack thereof—to the House of Auditore. You persist in adding "[Category:Ancestors of Noa Kim]" to various Auditore family even after the Staff member Lady Kyashira (above) has repeatedly undone them. If you have questions as to why they are being undone or want to dispute the changes, contact someone in Staff on their talk page. I just want to remind you to stop this before it escalates to action from the admins. – Darman (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed: Fragments – The Witches of the Moors[edit source]
Please refrain from editing pages if you have not experienced the piece of media they are from. From even just a quick read to your edits for both Margaux and Isaac du Queyran, there were things that never happen in the novel and even things the novel contradicts outright. - Soranin (talk) 15:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
First Warning - Edit warring[edit source]
This message serves to inform you that you've been banned for a period of one week due to persistent edit warring with categories.
It's crucial to understand that our work is a collaborative process, we seek to consistent information, not disruptive data. Should you ahve any comments on the subject, share them on the talkpage.
Do not continue with this behavior or further disciplinary action will be taken. Take this time to reflect on this and come back with a stronger commitment to the guidelines.
Cristophorus35 (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Pyara Kaur[edit source]
Either add a source, or desist. Consider this a warning. – Soranin (talk) 19:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- I will also add, you regularly add things to pages that Sol then undoes, only to revert to what you had written without consulting Sol or viewing the edit history, as it sometimes happens multiple times for a single page. This leaves other editors like myself to then restore pages back to Sol's version. Like Soranin said, cease this activity. As I have often put in my notes, I'm sure Sol has reasons for doing so, even if they're not always explained. If you have questions, take it up with them. – Darman (talk) 05:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

