Category talk:Candidates for deletion
 |
Assassin's Creed Rogue: Weapons
I would like to know why the article which i created is unecessary. It only gives people Info. about the weapons used in the game
Jayam (talk) 15:03, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
In time, all of the weapons will get their own articles, and will be added to the pages for the different weapon types.--Bovkaffe (talk) 15:28, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed Victory was leaked a few hours ago
- First, more than 24 hours ago. That's not "few". Second, keyword - "leaked". As in not announced officially. We don't deal in leaks here. --Kainzorus Prime ⚜ Walkie-talkie 22:13, December 3, 2014 (UTC)
Orthodox Church
Having reworked it to focus more on the series, I don't think it's irrelevant anymore. Makao the Byzantine {T/\L|<} 16:45, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
The page comprises of one sole instance for its entire history. It should be deleted now and restored further down the line if it does ever get another mention, unless you can discover one before it goes. Slate Vesper (talk) 01:22, December 18, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Timeline
Considering there was an agreement (quite some time ago, now) to remove these navboxes, and also considering the fact that this template is largely redundant. I propose we go about deleting this article. It's not needed, and is open to even the most insignificant event arguably deserving a place, which will just make the thing bloat uncontrollably.--Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:18, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
How is it 'redundant'? And there never was an agreement to remove all navboxes. -- Master Sima Yi Talk 19:26, February 9, 2015 (UTC)
SoulCalibur V
Is it described as canon (so far as Ezio's parts go)? If so, then the article should remain. If not, then I support deletion. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:37, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
I don't think we consider it canon. It only has a trivia point in some of the articles. I doubt SoulCalibur would be considered canon for characters like Kratos and Darth Vader either.--Bovkaffe (talk) 12:53, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to formally object to this page being deleted wholesale, without at least incorporating part of it into the Ezio article, (under the Soulcalibur V header in Trivia, of course). I get that it's not canon in the least, don't get me wrong, but we'd be getting rid of information that is related to the franchise (to a character in the franchise).
At the very least we could link to Ezio's article in the Soulcalibur wiki. --Zero-ELEC (talk) 22:26, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
- The plot reads very silly - I wouldn't be opposed to putting some of the info in trivia though. How would we link to the Soulcalibur article? External link? Crook The Constantine District 22:30, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
- An Interwiki link would work, something like this: "Soulcalibur Wiki: Ezio Auditore da Firenze". --Zero-ELEC (talk) 22:41, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed: Victory
I wiuld love to know the reason the article i wrote Assassin's Creed: Victory is a canidate for deletion. The game has been leaked, ill give it that, but Ubisoft themselves confirmed the game is real and coming out next year. We should also be a target site for people wanting to hear about he game than other websites who will get the news first. Please hear me out and save Victory!
-VladAssassin
This is a wiki, so it's not our job to provide news about leaked games. Which also means we don't compete with other sites for attention.--Bovkaffe (talk) 16:39, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
Vendetta and PS Home Content
Don't be too quick to delete; perhaps this could be rolled into a larger stub about PS Home content or "PS Home Abstergo Labs" Jasonnorthrup (talk) 18:40, December 31, 2014 (UTC)
I think they ought to be here for the sake of posterity and completeness; is there somewhere else they would fit better? Jasonnorthrup (talk) 00:18, January 2, 2015 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed: Comet
I'd like to formally oppose this deletion, since it's most definitely not an unnecessary redirect. The game itself is still referred to internally as ACC, and various in-game assets are referred to as "Comet". Additionally, if someone where to search on this wiki for Assassin's Creed: Comet, looking for the old production name for a game, they would not find the finished game, given that the Rogue article doesn't even have a single mention of that (even under development). This redirect is there for accessibility, and doesn't clutter or impede anything. --Zero-ELEC (talk) 22:13, May 7, 2015 (UTC) [Edited 04:29, May 9, 2015 (UTC)]
- While there is no harm in having it, there's also no benefit in having it either. Most people are going to search for it as "Rogue" because that's the commercial release title. And besides, all that can be done to resolve this is to make a trivia point mentioning that its internal title was Comet, which can still be seen in some conceptual documents. Slate Vesper (talk) 06:02, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
Connor's death
Hey I made a page caled Connor Kenway/Ratonhnhake:ton's Death but then it said they're gonna delete it because we don't know how he died but we do know how he died. It's in Assassin's Creed Rogue Abstergo files and I have a picture of it (Duh Assassin (talk) 15:11, August 22, 2015 (UTC)).
- The only thing the Rogue Abstergo files tell us about Connor's death is that it was "a mess". And seeing as that came from Melanie, a Templar, that is not the most reliable statement ever. Regardless, it's not worth creating an article for it :/ If we knew something about Connor's death, it would go on his article anyway. Crook The Constantine District 15:14, August 22, 2015 (UTC)
Buckingham
Since this "borough" has been removed from the source cited on the article, and the fact that the region around Buckingham Palace is actually a part of the City of Westminster (which is included on the cited source), I see no reason as to why this article should exist. If the series visits the town of Buckingham at some point, then the article can be re-created. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 09:11, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Fair points, sorry for being too hasty with the removal of the deletion template. I'll get rid of the article then, if that's cool with everyone? Crook The Constantine District 15:32, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
List of Characters
Why is this marked for deletion? It is a list of notable characters in the Series, which was not available on the Wikia before now. Yes, it does need updating and editing. But, when people researching the Series have looked for a list of characters, they could not find it. I have taken that into consideration before posting the article. BlackHawksChild (talk) 21:24, May 14, 2016 (UTC)BlackHawksChild
Regarding Assassin's Creed: Origins and Bayek, guys are you serious, we know enough although it hasn't been comfirmed by ubisoft themselves we know what the next Assassin's Creed is going to be like. Don't be all like: Ubisoft didn't confirm this, Ubisoft didn't confirm that we now have the pages setup so they can be edited when we know more (which is literally in 2 days time). Please remove the watermarks. Merijnj (talk) 20:53, June 10, 2017 (UTC)Merijnj
Assassin's Creed: Origins and Bayek
Guys seriously stop with the: Ubisoft didn't confirm it stuff. We know enough to start a page, and when we know more we edit it completely and correctly (BTW we know more in 2 days time). Literally just remove the watermark. Merijnj (talk) 20:56, June 10, 2017 (UTC)Merijnj
- I'm adding the tags as a matter of procedure and respect to guidelines. I personally think that integrity does matter, so that even if we're 99% certain of the veracity of something, we shouldn't add it if it's not properly sourced. Otherwise, it sets a precedent for people to argue that even if something isn't accurately sourced, suspicion that it is true nonetheless is cause for the material to remain. In any case, it is a bit moot since Ubisoft will announce it soon. If the articles are deleted, they can be restored at any time anyways once everything is confirmed. If not, well, we got a head-start. I just want to give a reminder that we should still respect proper sourcing. Also your article of Medjay cannot stand as just content copied from Wikipedia. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 00:47, June 11, 2017 (UTC)
Misthios
I've given my reasons more fully here, but for ease of reference I shall state I believe the articles were split far too early and that we're making an erroneous assumption that Kassandra is the canon Misthios. Far from deleting this article, I believe it should be returned to it's function as a primary article over Kassandra and Alexios upuntil the release of Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 08:21, July 16, 2018 (UTC)
Cyrenians vs. Cyreneans
Both Wiktionary and Free Dictionary agree that the term in 'Cyrenian', not 'Cyrenean'. That's why I used 'Cyrenian'.Sadelyrate (siniath) 05:47, September 18, 2018 (UTC)