Assassin's Creed Wiki:Featured Article Nominations

Bureau

Nominations Hub

Good article nominations

Featured article nominations

Recruitment

This page lists all the nominations for Featured status. The Rafiqan monitor this page and the voting process.

---

Featured is the highest level an article can achieve, and as such, it must meet certain requirements.

• …be well-written and detailed.
• …be unbiased, non-point of view.
• …be sourced with all available references and appearances.
• …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other wiki policies.
• …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags.
• …have a proper lead, with a undetailed résumé of the article's contents.
• …have no more than 6 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
• …have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
• …provide at least one quote on the article.
• …preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles.
• …include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
• …pass review by the Bureau review panel.

If the article meets at least 5 of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination.

---

How to nominate:

1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below.
2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is not good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
4. The article is placed on the Featured article list and categorized as such.
5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 Bureau supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "Featured article."

How to vote:

1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
3. Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have at least 50 mainspace edits.
   1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
4. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
5. Once the article has at least five supporting Bureau votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "Featured article." Non-Bureau members are also encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.

Also remember to add {{NomF}}at the top of the article you are nominating.

Archives: 1 – 2 – 3 – 4

Featured Status Nominations

Octavian de Valois - Yay

It's been a week now, and we have seven Yay's and zero Nay's. Nesty ^{Contact me!}19:36, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

The article was already in a pretty good shape, so I only had to do some minor cleaning up. I think it's ready now, but if you disagree, please let me know and I will fix whatever complaint you have. Thanks for voting, people :) Nesty Contact me! 09:13, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Yay As revamper and nominator. Nesty Contact me! 09:13, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Let's feature the Frenchy. :P Slate Vesper (talk) 16:38, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Thumbs up* -- IlMualim Wanna Chat? 17:01, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Why not? It's in good shape. Crimson Knight Intercom 17:04, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Oui, il a mon vote. -- ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 17:06, September 4, 2012 (UTC) From what I can see, it fits the requirements. Thumbs up from GI. ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 17:07, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Looks good to me. =GuardDog 22:22, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Nay Comments

Dilara - Yay

Another week has passed, and once again there have been no nay-sayers. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 13:45, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

So... Dilara. Go ahead and start voting people! If something is wrong, not good enough, or not pretty enough, feel free to let me know and I'll fix it up. That's all, I think.. Nesty Contact me! 10:59, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Yay As revamper and nominator. Nesty Contact me! 10:59, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Wow, I learned a lot more about her character than I thought I knew. An informative read. -- ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 12:20, September 12, 2012 (UTC) This page seems a lot more active when Nesty's around ;) ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 12:57, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Yay from me as well, the quotes in particular seem well placed. =GuardDog 13:08, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Really good, I learnt quite a bit too :) KaiserC (talk) 16:52, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Nay Comments On a side note, Nesty, would you mind if I gave myself a UserFA template for this article if it passes? I did a revamp to it back in January, and wrote more than half the content :) (Just asking, as you have the responsibility as nominator.) =GuardDog 13:08, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Of course, Guard. Anyone who did a substantial amount of work on the page has the right to use the userbox. :) Nesty Contact me! 13:32, September 12, 2012 (UTC)

Ratonhnhaké:ton - Yay

Another great addition to Featured status. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 06:40, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

Big and important page for the wiki. If you vote nay, let me know why so I can fix it. Nesty Contact me! 17:39, February 3, 2013 (UTC) Yay As revamper and nominator. Nesty Contact me! 17:39, February 3, 2013 (UTC) -- IlMualim Wanna Chat? 01:16, February 4, 2013 (UTC) Looks good to me. ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 09:12, February 4, 2013 (UTC) Looking good :) ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 23:01, February 4, 2013 (UTC) There we go. --NOSTALGIA TALK 23:08, February 5, 2013 (UTC) Given that I went over it and made some corrections, I figure that I should put my support down here. ;) Slate Vesper (talk) 03:44, February 6, 2013 (UTC) Stormbeast gives his approval for this nomination. Following this vote, Stormbeast will stop talking in the third person. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 00:21, February 7, 2013 (UTC) Nay Comments It needs some more images (specifically towards the end of his biography and subsequent sections), and the main quote needs to be shortened. Fix those things and I'll lend a Yay vote. --NOSTALGIA TALK 22:18, February 3, 2013 (UTC) Please take another look - shortened the main quote and Kain added images. Nesty Contact me! 11:42, February 4, 2013 (UTC) Main quote looks good now, though the personality and legacy sections still need more images. Also, the traitor at West Point part of the biography could use some images--if any are available. --NOSTALGIA TALK 22:10, February 4, 2013 (UTC) Yeah, I know - problem is, there aren't any since it's a PS exclusive DLC and no one seems to be capable of taking proper quality images of the PS. And I removed the Romantic Life section, seeing as we don't need an entire section just to say that he didn't have any. Nesty Contact me! 04:20, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Villa Auditore - Yay

Its been a week, and we have plenty yays versus no nays. Congrats, GI. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 12:22, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

Just finished a merge/expansion on this and Nesty said I should nominate it for FA once done. This is my first time revamping something to FA so please suggest any improvements I could make. :) ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 11:27, February 6, 2013 (UTC) Yay As revamper and nominator. ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 11:27, February 6, 2013 (UTC) Needed some work with sourcing and stuff, but it's thorough and has good images. --NOSTALGIA TALK 22:31, February 6, 2013 (UTC) Stormbeast lied... Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 00:21, February 7, 2013 (UTC) Slate Vesper (talk) 02:43, February 7, 2013 (UTC) You show great potential, GI. and thanks for taking this project off my hands Nesty Contact me! 10:56, February 7, 2013 (UTC) Auditore5 sì? 13:00, February 7, 2013 (UTC) yay The Dark Soul (talk) 15:09, February 7, 2013 (UTC) Yay. Kooala Cupcake. - Leave me a message! 15:34, February 7, 2013 (UTC) Nay Comments

William Miles - Yay

It's been a week and there are no nays. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 23:28, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

Did a complete overhaul of the article. Wording and content are thorough and up to par, though certain parts of the biography lack images or quotes because none are available as he is not seen and/or heard during any of those times. I also did some last minute work with Storm, and he agrees it's worthy. --NOSTALGIA TALK 07:27, February 10, 2013 (UTC) Yay --NOSTALGIA TALK 07:27, February 10, 2013 (UTC) I add my name to the roster, as you have mentioned. Might as well make it official. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 07:53, February 10, 2013 (UTC Just made some tiny tweaks, but I think it's completely ready now. Slate Vesper (talk) 08:09, February 10, 2013 (UTC) Just finished reading through it - well-written, and has plenty of images. It's got my vote. ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 08:55, February 10, 2013 (UTC) Nay Comments

Aquila - Yay

Clearly worthy of FA. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 22:44, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

Nominated by DarkFeather. Yay ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 04:52, March 7, 2013 (UTC) Good grammar and language, plenty of pictures, informative, covers the history. I approve. Crimson Knight Intercom 21:52, March 7, 2013 (UTC) -- IlMualim Wanna Chat? 22:12, March 7, 2013 (UTC) Looks good. --NOSTALGIA TALK 02:01, March 8, 2013 (UTC) Looks very well done, thoughts are organized, appropriate pictures, grammar all good. Very well done. --Fragment -Animus- 02:10, March 8, 2013 (UTC) I'm on a boat. ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 02:15, March 8, 2013 (UTC) I support this page, covers everything it needs to in detail. Eggy2504 (talk) 15:45, March 8, 2013 (UTC) Looks Good. Il Prode lupo ~ Temi il Lupo! ~ Rispettare il Lupo! 15:51, March 8, 2013 (UTC) As one of the users here, i shall approve to this vote... This decision is final and cannot be compromised/removed... AnsweratioN Coffee Maybe?Wisdom words 16:12, March 8, 2013 (UTC) It could be a little more in-depth on the privateer contracts, though nothing major. Nesty Contact me! 17:00, March 8, 2013 (UTC) Finally got around to reading it. Very well done, Dark. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 17:22, March 8, 2013 (UTC) Nay Comments

Gérald Blanc - Yay

And so we have another one. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 12:52, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

I hope I'm doing this right. So, as part of my current Apprentice Assignment, I am to get three articles to status, of which good ol' Gérald is the first. I'd like to extend my thanks again to Kain, who I've basically been hounding for screenshots ever since mid-February... and will continue to hound for quite some time, I think :P If there's anything that you think can be improved, please tell me and I will try to fix it. I want to make this article the very best it can be :) I think that is all, so thanks in advance for reading. Crook The Constantine District 21:49, March 31, 2014 (UTC) Yay As nominator. Crook The Constantine District 21:49, March 31, 2014 (UTC) --Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 21:51, March 31, 2014 (UTC) Well done, Crook--Fragment -Animus- 00:18, April 1, 2014 (UTC) Nicely done, Crook.... -- AgentG231 (talk) 01:03, April 1, 2014 (UTC) I...er...vote...um...yes... Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 18:42, April 1, 2014 (UTC) Round 1 complete! DarkFeather Raven's NestRaven's Hunt 20:23, April 1, 2014 (UTC) I'm going to be a daring individual and vote yay. :) Slate Vesper (talk) 20:55, April 1, 2014 (UTC) Very well-written, Crook. <choose><option>http://images.wikia.com/assassinscreed/images/7/7f/ArcemzSig.png</option></choose> 09:17, April 3, 2014 (UTC) Nay Comments

Élise Lafleur - Yay

w00t. Crook ^{The Constantine District} 16:39, April 18, 2014 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

Here's hoping Élise goes as smoothly as Gérald :) Thanks to everybody who voted last time, really happy about the positive reception. As before, if there's anything that you believe can be improved, please don't hesitate to say so. Thanks in advance for reading. Crook The Constantine District 13:26, April 8, 2014 (UTC) Yay As nominator. Crook The Constantine District 13:26, April 8, 2014 (UTC) Naw. Yes. One of those. --Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 14:32, April 8, 2014 (UTC) I see we 'ave another great article 'ere. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 15:22, April 8, 2014 (UTC) I, the Leader of the Grotherhood, hereby declare that this is eligible to have the FA status! --AgentG231 (talk) 06:01, April 9, 2014 (UTC) That's nice. --Crimson Knight Intercom 12:41, April 9, 2014 (UTC) I'm in. DarkFeather Raven's NestRaven's Hunt 00:08, April 12, 2014 (UTC) Holy crap, been ages since I've seen an FA nomination... I really need to check the Wiki more often. ;_; --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 10:40, April 12, 2014 (UTC) Nay Comments

Modern Times

Still has more Yays... -- Master Sima Yi _Talk 07:25, June 6, 2014 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

Hey guys. G here and I'm trying to get the FA status for the Modern times page as part of my apprenticeship. For the past few weeks, Molotov and I added more content to it as it was badly outdated with Slate and Rag helping us with the wording. We added it with more photos, a quote, and contents from Brahman and Initiates. If there is something wrong about the page, please feel free to tell me in my talk page and with no more further ado, let's start the voting! (Thanks to my mentor, Teller for motivating me for this project!) --AgentG231 (talk) 00:50, April 25, 2014 (UTC) Yay As nominator. --AgentG231 (talk) 00:50, April 25, 2014 (UTC) --Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 01:08, April 25, 2014 (UTC)  Looks really good :) --Raghava Shah 03:02, April 25, 2014 (UTC) Shameless preening here. -Molotov.cockroach (talk) 08:06, April 25, 2014 (UTC) Looks perfect.Joker (talk) 20:47, May 3, 2014 (UTC)Joker0002710 Nay My reasoning is similar to Slate, it's just I'm more than comfortable spiting you with a nay vote but I'm also not sure if this article really stands up the status of other featured articles. It's not a bad article by any means; it's informative and encompasses a lot of facts, but I just don't think that this is the kind of article that should be featured. --Crimson Knight Intercom 18:38, April 26, 2014 (UTC) Crimson and I came to the same decision, for the same reasons. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 04:04, May 1, 2014 (UTC) Blergh. I really hate voting nay, but oh well. Many of the sections are way too short. I understand that, sometimes, there is just not enough information to make them larger, but in that case you should either merge it with other sections or find another way to expand on them. And yeah, then there is the constant adding factor, but I suppose that can be easily helped by a few users pledging to keep the page in shape, which I am willing to assist with. Nesty Contact me! 07:09, May 1, 2014 (UTC) Also don't like saying nay, but it must be done. 1-2 sentence paragraphs are not OK, and they are right that the sections are too short. Try consolidating it so it looks like a piece of professional writing, and put it back up for vote. Content-wise, it looks good, but structurally it does not. I'd be happy to take a look at it for you at any time during the restructuring process -- hit up the Raven's Nest any time to let me know, or r.msg me. DarkFeather Raven's NestRaven's Hunt 00:54, May 3, 2014 (UTC) Comments While I'm not going to spite you with a Nay vote, I do not think I should vote on the outcome of the page with the article subject being as it is. Modern times is always going to be added to, and I'd rather not vote a page to Featured Status if the ruling is going to be invalidated constantly (with Initiates) or on a yearly basis (with a new game). Slate Vesper (talk) 02:13, April 26, 2014 (UTC) While I've already put in my yay vote, I will say that this concern makes sense to me. Hopefully we can get some input from a few more people on this before it closes. -Molotov.cockroach (talk) 18:18, April 26, 2014 (UTC) You have your point Slate. But if it will pass the FA nom, we will make sure that even though this article needs to be updated every now and then, we can work together to make this article still worthy for FA (that's how a wiki works right?). --AgentG231 (talk) 00:21, April 27, 2014 (UTC) Perhaps, but you do have to consider that with the release of new games, it can be revamp every time, due to any minor clues resolved with new lore, in addition to the bulk of modern day story. I fear that with Ubisoft's insistence on an annual cycle, it could be left to slip back into that sort of condition. Slate Vesper (talk) 22:20, April 27, 2014 (UTC) I found the suggestions here useful and updated the Modern times page with them in mind, though not specifically to sway any opinions. If anyone has any further suggestions, please let us know. -Molotov.cockroach (talk) 20:22, May 3, 2014 (UTC)