Talk:Assassin Gauntlet: Difference between revisions
imported>Slate Vesper |
imported>The Crimson Eagle |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:::To have that be the reasoning for keeping them seperate, when all are being proposed to be merged, is a little pointless. They're seperate for the sake of seperatism, and perhaps linkage. Given they're modifications to a base template, it'd be more understandable to merge to Hidden Blade and have their own subsection detailing them if they're truly that noteworthy. [[User:Slate Vesper|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper|talk]]) 23:36, June 23, 2015 (UTC) | :::To have that be the reasoning for keeping them seperate, when all are being proposed to be merged, is a little pointless. They're seperate for the sake of seperatism, and perhaps linkage. Given they're modifications to a base template, it'd be more understandable to merge to Hidden Blade and have their own subsection detailing them if they're truly that noteworthy. [[User:Slate Vesper|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper|talk]]) 23:36, June 23, 2015 (UTC) | ||
Can we make a decision please? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 13:06, August 8, 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:06, 8 August 2015
To Merge or not to Merge?
Personally, I don't think this should be merged. The reasoning is that this is the same reason as the Hookblade, which is basically a Hidden Blade with a secondary hook attachment. This is a Hidden Blade with a secondary grappling hook and tertiary dart launcher attachment. In summary, if we are to merge this one, we should merge Hookblade as well, and since I doubt we're merging that, then I doubt we should merge this.GZilla311 (talk) 14:44, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. This article's information should probably be on Hidden Blade as well, but the separate article might as well remain. --Crimson Knight Intercom 15:42, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Thing is though, the Hookblade page is bland and doesn't add anything really that new as what's elaborated on with the Hidden Blade subsection. Just trivia pieces. In all fairness, anything relevant on Hookblade could easily be transferred to Hidden Blade and the page deleted.
- It seems a little silly for every new iteration of the Hidden Blade to have its own page when they're all just re-inventions of the one basic tool that all Assassins utilise with some new quirk. Slate Vesper (talk) 16:11, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Well, that's fair. All I'm interested in is consistency. If we just combine all the articles into one, I'm fine with that. But let's see what other people think. --Crimson Knight Intercom 16:28, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
I'd go for merging, but that's just my personal preference. Nesty Contact me! 16:47, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
I am also for merging. From what I've gathered, from various websites, the "Assassin Gauntlet" is nothing new, just the name of the bracer which most Assassins have already possessed. The new feature is the rope launcher, hallucinogenic darts already being a thing. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 20:53, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Merge, as long as we're consistent about it. Crook The Constantine District 21:01, May 14, 2015 (UTC)
- I am for keeping the articles separate. We have separate hookblade and Phantom Blade article after all. Perhaps the article should be renamed rope gun, since this is the newest feature to be included on a hidden blade. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 22:29, May 17, 2015 (UTC)
- To have that be the reasoning for keeping them seperate, when all are being proposed to be merged, is a little pointless. They're seperate for the sake of seperatism, and perhaps linkage. Given they're modifications to a base template, it'd be more understandable to merge to Hidden Blade and have their own subsection detailing them if they're truly that noteworthy. Slate Vesper (talk) 23:36, June 23, 2015 (UTC)
Can we make a decision please? --Crimson Knight Intercom 13:06, August 8, 2015 (UTC)