Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Arthur Pendragon: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>ACsenior
Adding categories
imported>Vetinari
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Arthur possessed a sacred [[Swords|sword]] called {{Wiki|Excalibur}} or Caliburn, one of the [[Swords of Eden]], which he pulled from a stone.<ref name="ACII">''[[Assassin's Creed II]]'' - [[Glyphs]]</ref> However, he was later betrayed by those he loved, which ultimately led to his death.<ref name="ACH">''[[Assassin's Creed: Heresy]]''</ref>
Arthur possessed a sacred [[Swords|sword]] called {{Wiki|Excalibur}} or Caliburn, one of the [[Swords of Eden]], which he pulled from a stone.<ref name="ACII">''[[Assassin's Creed II]]'' - [[Glyphs]]</ref> However, he was later betrayed by those he loved, which ultimately led to his death.<ref name="ACH">''[[Assassin's Creed: Heresy]]''</ref>


==Trivia==
[[Alan Rikkin]] was of the opinion that Arthur's view of the Templars' role was idealistic and misguided, seeing his failure as proof that the Order was meant to follow a different path in the 21st century.<ref name="ACH"/>
*[[Alan Rikkin]] was of the opinion that Arthur's view of the Templars' role was idealistic and misguided, seeing his failure as proof that the Order was meant to follow a different path.<ref name="ACH"/>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 17:27, 11 March 2017


File:Arthur.png
Arthur pulling out the sword

King Arthur Pendragon was a legendary British leader who led the defense of Britain against the Saxon invaders in the early 6th century, and later became the king of Britain. He was also a member of the millenary organization that would come to be known as the Templar Order.

Arthur possessed a sacred sword called Excalibur or Caliburn, one of the Swords of Eden, which he pulled from a stone.[1] However, he was later betrayed by those he loved, which ultimately led to his death.[2]

Alan Rikkin was of the opinion that Arthur's view of the Templars' role was idealistic and misguided, seeing his failure as proof that the Order was meant to follow a different path in the 21st century.[2]

References