Talk:SAVAK

This is the discussion page for SAVAK. Here, you may discuss improving the article. To discuss the subject itself, use the Forums.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Be polite Assume good faith Do not insult other people

Arabic

Not sure if we allow names to be in languages other than English...anyone else know if that Arabic should be removed? --Fragment ^-Animus- 23:23, October 2, 2013 (UTC)

I've altered it to be bracketed like we would have on other articles. Slate Vesper (talk) 23:27, October 2, 2013 (UTC)

U da best slate :] --Fragment ^-Animus- 00:03, October 3, 2013 (UTC)

Mossad

The information on this page is not accurate 

there was never any involvment of the Mossad with the SAVAK.

Though somebody is editing this page and trying to spread this lie for an "unknown" reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.38.151 (talk)

I can't check this right now, but I'm guessing it comes from the Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood Rifts. I'll check tomorrow if someone doesn't beat me to it. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 06:29, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

You should check this here 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAVAK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.38.151 (talk)

Wikipedia is not part of the Assassin's Creed universe, and is not in any way a source was can use. (I thought I was removing the information in my undo, but for some reason I re-added it.) -- Master Sima Yi _Talk 06:36, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

There is also the fact that Wikipedia is crowd-sourced and explicitly not a reliable source according to our sourcing policy. --Jasca Ducato _{Council Chamber} ^{Assassination record} 09:09, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Did you find any proof of this lie yet?

You cant make up things that reflect your political views. when you find a proof of the Mossad involvment then you can edit this page and write this, There is no mention of the Mossad in the entire from the Assassin's Creed series. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.38.151 (talk)

Considering I don't even know what the Mossad is, I honestly doubt it's due to my "political views". Also, please sign your posts. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 17:48, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Accusing the Mossad in involment with the SAVAK is some dangeroug business with international law. 

Be careful with what you are doing every thing is recorded and *will be used in court. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.38.151 (talk)

Information about a fictional universe will be used in court. Okay. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 18:02, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Spreading this sencitive false information about a Jewish Gov. organization can be seen as an antisemitic propoganda.

therefore it will be used in court.  

Thank you for accepting this warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.38.151 (talk)

It's called sarcasm. I wasn't accepting anything because, as stated by Ubisoft in the opening of every game: "Inspired by historical events and character. This work of fiction was designed, developed and produced by a multicultural team of various religious faiths and beliefs." And, for the love of God, sign your posts. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 18:20, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, of course, a court will take fictional game lore as real-life evidence, and will totally not throw out the case for said reason. Especially the fact you're posing this "warning" to us, and not Ubisoft, who would the be responsible party if this is what they have implemented.

That first sentence was sarcasm, by the way, and your threats are meaningless. Let's see you actually try to prosecute someone, because as I see it, you're using an anonymous mask to stir up unneeded conflict on some troll crusade. Slate Vesper (talk) 18:25, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Fortunately, third world countries have no pull over here. Good effort though. --Kainzorus Prime ^{Walkie-talkie} 18:27, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Firstly, if there is no actual mention of Mossad in the cited source then the information will, of course! be removed. That said, it certainly won't be due to your ridiculous legal threats, I assure you. Now, you can either stop trolling, or you can be banned for being a nuisance and vandalising the article repeatedly.

If you do, genuinely, want to sue me, well I'm somewhat busy for the rest of this week, but I have a few minutes spare on Wednesday for you to take me to a court of your choice. To everybody else, can we please just ignore the troll now? --Jasca Ducato _{Council Chamber} ^{Assassination record} 22:27, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

This is priceless anon. Thank you for giving me a laugh. ► Kaloneous ◄ _{♣^HelpDesk♣} 10:41, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

sigh. If you think we are racists, then don't come here... Do you even know the meaning of fiction? Thanks for the laughs... -- AgentG231 (talk) 11:24, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

I don't see race being mentioned anywhere in this conversation... --Jasca Ducato _{Council Chamber} ^{Assassination record} 11:28, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

How about that anon spoke anything about 'anti-Semitic'. Semites are Muslims, assuming that he is a Semite himself... -- AgentG231 (talk) 11:56, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Actually, Semites (in the context you're thinking of) tends to be referring Jews, not Muslims. Yes, it's pretty clear the anon is Jewish... --Jasca Ducato _{Council Chamber} ^{Assassination record} 11:59, November 15, 2013 (UTC)