Talk:...Everything Is Permitted
Date[edit source]
Surely this memory would have taken place in 1721 if Edward had inflicted damage six years prior? He wasn't involved with the Templars or Assassins in 1714. --Crimson Knight Intercom 15:44, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- They frequently make mistakes like this. Like Haytham asking George Washington in 1778 about his attack on Kanahtasehton "fourteen years ago", when it was in 1760.--Bovkaffe (talk) 15:49, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Normally, I wouldn't point this out, but the fact that I'm also sure that To Suffer Without Dying ends in 1721 makes me concerned that we have a relatively major date discrepancy. I could provide a few reasons for that, but I'm sure people could figure it out. Where exactly is the source for the 1720 date? --Crimson Knight Intercom 15:52, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- How though? Did Mary and Anne somehow go through pregnancy within four months? Also, doesn't the database indicate that Mary died in 1721? --Crimson Knight Intercom 15:56, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Well, if they were captured in 1719, I suppose this is tolerable. Seriously though, it would have made a lot more sense to have just followed history in this instance. Make her captured in 1720, as she was in real life, and have her die in 1721. Simple. --Crimson Knight Intercom 16:24, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
Remind me though, where does 1719 come from? I won't lie, I stopped reading most database entries after ACR. --Crimson Knight Intercom 16:27, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem to have specifically been answered although might have been applied to the article anyways but if the date come from a deduction it should probably have a footnote regarding how. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 06:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Really all dates in memory pages should have citations or footnotes going forward. It was always bad practice not to have them, and now so many memory pages have uncertain or incorrect dates. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 05:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Robes[edit source]
It's ironic to know that Edward made a mistake by not knowing that what Duncan wore was reserved for Assassins who earned the right to wear robes like what Duncan wore, and that the Assassins didn't like the idea of Edward impersonating Duncan, prompting Ah Tabai to warn Edward that he wasn't welcome in Tulum. If Edward was an ancestor to Desmond and William, why did Ah Tabai said that Edward wasn't welcome in Tulum earlier in the game? 107.211.254.190 20:49, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
- What’s Desmond and William got to do with it? They’re not even going to be alive for another 250 years. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 07:36, October 1, 2015 (UTC)