Category talk:Candidates for deletion: Difference between revisions
imported>Jasca Ducato m Archiving |
imported>Jasca Ducato |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Template:Timeline== | ==Template:Timeline== | ||
Considering there was an agreement (quite some time ago, now) to remove these navboxes, and also considering the fact that this template is largely redundant. I propose we go about deleting this article. It's not needed, and is open to even the most insignificant event arguably deserving a place, which will just make the thing bloat uncontrollably.--'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 12:18, December 19, 2014 (UTC) | Considering there was an agreement (quite some time ago, now) to remove these navboxes, and also considering the fact that this template is largely redundant. I propose we go about deleting this article. It's not needed, and is open to even the most insignificant event arguably deserving a place, which will just make the thing bloat uncontrollably.--'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 12:18, December 19, 2014 (UTC) | ||
==SoulCalibur V== | |||
Is it described as canon (so far as Ezio's parts go)? If so, then the article should remain. If not, then I support deletion. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 12:37, December 19, 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:37, 19 December 2014
 |
Assassin's Creed Rogue: Weapons
I would like to know why the article which i created is unecessary. It only gives people Info. about the weapons used in the game
Jayam (talk) 15:03, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
In time, all of the weapons will get their own articles, and will be added to the pages for the different weapon types.--Bovkaffe (talk) 15:28, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed Victory was leaked a few hours ago
- First, more than 24 hours ago. That's not "few". Second, keyword - "leaked". As in not announced officially. We don't deal in leaks here. --Kainzorus Prime ⚜ Walkie-talkie 22:13, December 3, 2014 (UTC)
Orthodox Church
Having reworked it to focus more on the series, I don't think it's irrelevant anymore. Makao the Byzantine {T/\L|<} 16:45, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
The page comprises of one sole instance for its entire history. It should be deleted now and restored further down the line if it does ever get another mention, unless you can discover one before it goes. Slate Vesper (talk) 01:22, December 18, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Timeline
Considering there was an agreement (quite some time ago, now) to remove these navboxes, and also considering the fact that this template is largely redundant. I propose we go about deleting this article. It's not needed, and is open to even the most insignificant event arguably deserving a place, which will just make the thing bloat uncontrollably.--Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:18, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
SoulCalibur V
Is it described as canon (so far as Ezio's parts go)? If so, then the article should remain. If not, then I support deletion. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:37, December 19, 2014 (UTC)