Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User talk:WarBB: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Soranin
Created page with "==Disruptive edits== If you disagree with the edits, then argue your points in the talk page rather than start an edit war. - ~~~~"
 
imported>Sol Pacificus
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Disruptive edits==
==Disruptive edits==
If you disagree with the edits, then argue your points in the talk page rather than start an edit war. - [[User:Soranin|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin|talk]]) 21:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
If you disagree with the edits, then argue your points in the talk page rather than start an edit war. - [[User:Soranin|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin|talk]]) 21:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to repeat that you must desist from edit warring. Disputes over edits should be communicated via talk pages. Simply reverting edits again and again without explanation is highly disruptive to the wiki. I understand that the onus to provide an explanation does go both ways and that the other editors could have clarified why yours were reverted, and I will be letting them know this, but this does not give you license to perpetuate the cycle, and from what I can tell, your edits were in error. That is, of course, unless you can explain otherwise. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 11 January 2021

Disruptive edits

If you disagree with the edits, then argue your points in the talk page rather than start an edit war. - Soranin (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to repeat that you must desist from edit warring. Disputes over edits should be communicated via talk pages. Simply reverting edits again and again without explanation is highly disruptive to the wiki. I understand that the onus to provide an explanation does go both ways and that the other editors could have clarified why yours were reverted, and I will be letting them know this, but this does not give you license to perpetuate the cycle, and from what I can tell, your edits were in error. That is, of course, unless you can explain otherwise. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 17:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)