Talk:Database: Difference between revisions
imported>Zero-ELEC →Identity "codex": Hmmm... |
imported>UJ112013 |
||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
This is odd, the [[Monteriggioni]] entry seems to be exactly the same as the one from ''II''. How should this be handled? Should I make a new page for the ''Identity'' version or just link the older one and add the necessary categories to that one? — [[User:Zero-ELEC|Zero-ELEC]] ([[User talk:Zero-ELEC|talk]]) 20:14, May 26, 2016 (UTC) | This is odd, the [[Monteriggioni]] entry seems to be exactly the same as the one from ''II''. How should this be handled? Should I make a new page for the ''Identity'' version or just link the older one and add the necessary categories to that one? — [[User:Zero-ELEC|Zero-ELEC]] ([[User talk:Zero-ELEC|talk]]) 20:14, May 26, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I think you can make a new page, like: [[Database: Ezio Auditore (Assassin's Creed II)]] and [[Database: Ezio Auditore da Firenze (Revelations)]].--[[User:UJ112013|UJ112013]] ([[User talk:UJ112013|talk]]) 04:37, April 4, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:37, 4 April 2017
Database writer in Revelations?
So since everyone on the outside, including Shaun, doesn't know Desmond was actually going through Ezio's memories, who wrote the database articles in Revelations? Sixteen? I haven't had enough time to read all the entires, but there seemed to be a certain kind of Shaun-esque snark to the entries I read, which, if true, is a major continuity error on Ubisoft's part. Any thoughts? Thewootinater 17:20, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
Sixteen most likely wrote the Animus Database Articles in Revelations, if you read the last paragraph of Ezio's entry, it states, when talking about Eagle Sense, "I got a little taste myself, in the short time I spent with him, but since my time with him went dark much sooner than yours did, I never got the full experience." Master Decoder 10:20, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
About the Menu for animus 3.0
I really cant find a proper image. I had no choice but to put a menu image. Please help. Deniedoperative (talk) 08:41, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
It made for a nice filler. If Fraps will peacefully coexist with my copy of AC3 I may be able to get one myself. Lucan07Haunt me...and Stuff 08:43, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, vesper edited it out. Deniedoperative (talk) 08:45, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I was cleaning up most of the information on the page. The best person to ask regarding images is Vatsa, he should be able to tell whether it'd be reasonable to keep or remove it. Slate Vesper (talk) 08:49, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up Vesper. Deniedoperative (talk) 09:01, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Mmkay, sorted. Lucan07Haunt me...and Stuff 09:28, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
The Lost Archive Database?
The Lost Archive has its own database, consisting of decipher fragments, letters and voice logs. Should it be mentioned in this article?Sadelyrate (talk) 00:02, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
It definitely should, but under the revelations animus subheading 2.03. References to abstergo and third party sources should be included. Deniedoperative (talk) 09:55, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
TLA's database entries
The red links for The Lost Archive are pestering me. What would be an appropriate way of making the Database entries for the Decipher fragments, Letters and Voice log? The fragments' database 'entry' is merely an image. Sadelyrate (siniath) 05:33, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
Feasible?
Is it feasible to continue the structure this article has held up until now? Black Flag, Freedom Cry and now Rogue all use the Animus Omega version - how will we differentiate between these if not by game?
Also, Liberation's database is missing here - even if it's only "real" database entries are on the people. Crook The Constantine District 16:16, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Last I checked, we did the database entries by game. Who changed them? Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 17:01, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
Linking
I don't know if this has already been noticed, but since the restructuring of the database entries on the wiki, a lot of the links are messed up. I'm not quite sure how to fix it myself, so I thought I should mention it here.--Bovkaffe (talk) 13:05, March 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Going through this, I'd say those pages do not exist. A few subpages might, but there is no index that can replace the dead links in this article. Also, inconsistency titles. --VATSA (TALK • GENTEK) 13:46, March 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Is there any way for us to fix that? :s Crook The Constantine District 13:55, March 29, 2015 (UTC)
- I can get my bot to rename and update the links for existing articles. Can't help much with what could be missing, since I haven't been around AC Series for a while. We can always count on our living encyclopedia for that.. --VATSA (TALK • GENTEK) 15:19, March 29, 2015 (UTC)
Identity "codex"
Should the "codex" entries featured Assassin's Creed: Identity be added to the wiki as Database entries? If not, how should they be categorized? — Zero-ELEC (talk) 02:44, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with Identity, but I'm guessing these Codex entries are essentially a Database, but just under a different name? Amnestyyy (Contact me!) <helper /> 09:45, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly that. — Zero-ELEC (talk) 14:31, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
- In that case, we'll just put them up here. That seems a better option than to create a separate page for it, which would then easily be confused with the various codex articles we already have. Amnestyyy (Contact me!) <helper /> 15:00, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly that. — Zero-ELEC (talk) 14:31, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
This is odd, the Monteriggioni entry seems to be exactly the same as the one from II. How should this be handled? Should I make a new page for the Identity version or just link the older one and add the necessary categories to that one? — Zero-ELEC (talk) 20:14, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
- I think you can make a new page, like: Database: Ezio Auditore (Assassin's Creed II) and Database: Ezio Auditore da Firenze (Revelations).--UJ112013 (talk) 04:37, April 4, 2017 (UTC)