Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Apple of Eden 4: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Francesco75
imported>Master Sima Yi
Line 8: Line 8:
:Short answer its most likely a retcon but if forced to deconflict without Ubisoft's input it’s possible by artifact they aren’t referring to the PoE but the Die Glocke or whatever device was used in conjunction with said PoE. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 12:53, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
:Short answer its most likely a retcon but if forced to deconflict without Ubisoft's input it’s possible by artifact they aren’t referring to the PoE but the Die Glocke or whatever device was used in conjunction with said PoE. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 12:53, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
::I think we need an answer from Aymar Azaïzia who have surely a good explanation for this Apple who was in the hands of the Templars and the Assassins in 1943, returned to Hitler in 1945 before being killed by the Assassin, strangely returned to Neumann before 1957 and seems to be in two places at the same time. Maybe a time paradox?[[User:Francesco75|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75|talk]]) 13:02, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
::I think we need an answer from Aymar Azaïzia who have surely a good explanation for this Apple who was in the hands of the Templars and the Assassins in 1943, returned to Hitler in 1945 before being killed by the Assassin, strangely returned to Neumann before 1957 and seems to be in two places at the same time. Maybe a time paradox?[[User:Francesco75|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75|talk]]) 13:02, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
:::''Conspiracies'' and ''Bloodstone'' pick up on some cool older elements of the lore, but sadly have quite a few retcons that could have been easily avoided, like was mentioned here. ''AC1'' never clarified with Piece of Eden was used in the Philadelphia Project, and then ''Conspiracies'' says it's Apple of Eden 4. Not only that, but it's implied that the USS ''Eldridge'' did not travel in time as the ''AC1'' email says, and the Apple of Eden was perfectly fine while the email says the artifact involved in the experiment was damaged and no longer worked. Then it's also highly unlikely that the Apple went from being in Pash's and von Neumann's possession in 1943, back to Hitler in 1945 ''after'' the Templars turned their backs on him, then back to von Neumann afterward. And then there's Chapman owning the artifact for '''forty whole years''' from 1977 to 2017 while the ''AC1'' email says it was held in storage by Abstergo in 2012. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 13:49, May 6, 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:49, 6 May 2020

This is the discussion page for Apple of Eden 4.
Here, you may discuss improving the article.

Dates and information discrepancy

On the page it says "where it came into the possession of Adolf Hitler just before the Nazi Party took power in Germany to begin World War II", the party took power in 1933, however the owners list showed that Hitler had the apple in 1939 from Ford.  Batran99 (talk) 16:00, August 23, 2018 (UTC)

The soruce provided is quite clear that the Apple was provided to Hitler before he came ot power, so the date against Edison's name is incorrect. I'll fix it now. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 08:17, August 24, 2018 (UTC)

Chronology?

How could Abstergo repaired the Apple 4 in 2012 if Chapman had it since 1977?Francesco75 (talk) 11:31, May 6, 2020 (UTC)

Short answer its most likely a retcon but if forced to deconflict without Ubisoft's input it’s possible by artifact they aren’t referring to the PoE but the Die Glocke or whatever device was used in conjunction with said PoE. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 12:53, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
I think we need an answer from Aymar Azaïzia who have surely a good explanation for this Apple who was in the hands of the Templars and the Assassins in 1943, returned to Hitler in 1945 before being killed by the Assassin, strangely returned to Neumann before 1957 and seems to be in two places at the same time. Maybe a time paradox?Francesco75 (talk) 13:02, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
Conspiracies and Bloodstone pick up on some cool older elements of the lore, but sadly have quite a few retcons that could have been easily avoided, like was mentioned here. AC1 never clarified with Piece of Eden was used in the Philadelphia Project, and then Conspiracies says it's Apple of Eden 4. Not only that, but it's implied that the USS Eldridge did not travel in time as the AC1 email says, and the Apple of Eden was perfectly fine while the email says the artifact involved in the experiment was damaged and no longer worked. Then it's also highly unlikely that the Apple went from being in Pash's and von Neumann's possession in 1943, back to Hitler in 1945 after the Templars turned their backs on him, then back to von Neumann afterward. And then there's Chapman owning the artifact for forty whole years from 1977 to 2017 while the AC1 email says it was held in storage by Abstergo in 2012. -- Master Sima Yi Talk 13:49, May 6, 2020 (UTC)