User talk:Altair45678
Reverts on "Shay Cormac" article[edit source]
Hello Altair45678, could you please explain to me why you are undoing my corrections to another user's edits on the Shay Cormac article? I have already explained in the edit summary the reasons why his addition is not quite acceptable: it violates two policies, neutral point-of-view and in-universe writing. For more information, please refer to our Manual of Style. If you have valid reasons for believing that my edits are in error, you should always take the time to explain those reasons in the edit summary for efficient communication. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 02:26, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
Cult of Kosmos[edit source]
Hi there. I've noticed that you've been listing the Cult of Kosmos as a proto-Templar organisation recently (among other edits), but have so far not provided a source for your changes. Please be aware that any changes to articles that add new information (or even old information) need to be fully sourced in order to be compliant with our Sourcing policy and Manual of Style. Until such time that you provide a source for your edits, I'm afraid they will continue to be reverted.
On that note, please also be advised that many of your additions have been reverted at least twice now - if you revert to include the information (without a source) once more, you will be issued with an official warning. Thanks. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 14:51, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
Vandalism[edit source]
I do not appreciate the vandalism you put on my page. I am aware that you undid it, but the fact you did vandalize my user page kind of pissed me off. If following the guidelines of this wiki makes me seem like a "tyrant", so be it, but do not edit other peoples user pages without their permission. The Cat Master (talk) 18:32, July 9, 2018 (UTC)