User blog comment:The.Outsider/Daniel's Part In AC3/ Templars & Assassins Argument/@comment-4829046-20120925144841

Wow...I am stunned at what took place here.

Just to let you know, If it were "me" I would kill not according to such beliefs but rather in the hope of protecting all the innocent people. In which case I would have to become a loner who kills people indiscriminately regardless of race, gender etc. Sinners should be punished. If I had a hidden blade and a hoodie I'd probably go around the city listening to news about murder cases and crimes. Then I would just trail along the rooftops looking for murderers and sinners. If there was a badass bullet proof Assassin, he would probably charge head-first into the War in the middle East, killing everyone who gets in his way and trying to stop the war as quickly as possible. A true hero of the shadows.

Referring to ALL Templars as bad and ALL Assassins as good in such debates is useless. There are all kinds of people and not all the Templars and Assassins have the same mindset. As long as there is individuality there will always be war and violence. In this way, if you look at it, the Templars idea of controlling the people via PoE and such is indeed one step closer to world peace. I would do the same if I had only one lifetime to bring peace to the world. The Assassins method for peace is a LOT more difficult and the order needs to work for centuries or millennia to keep the peace stable. The Assassins method maybe realistically portrayed but the Templar method is more permanent and decisive. So in the end the only way for total peace forever would be forced control, causing people to give up their individuality. This applies to Naruto as well XD