Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User blog comment:SpaceKat/assassin's creed in general/@comment-187.32.127.181-20120411044356/@comment-187.32.127.181-20120411161829

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"By that logic, you should also complain that the fact that there is more than one Piece of Eden was not mentioned in the first Assassin's Creed, amongst a lot of other things."

What? In the end of the game the apple show us all pieces of Eden. All spots and everything. Bleeding Effect started in AC1 too, so in AC2 was familiar. But things like "A letter from Giovanni" or "Something that Altair created" and never mentioned in Codex or previously games are just to make money.

I'm complain about that Revelations starts in 1511. It should started since Brotherhood. Like Brotherhood started since 2 (The only thing I like in Brotherhood was the beginning). To show how he left the Brotherhood, what happening to the "omnipotent" armor of Brutus and etc.

And even you (I know you are one of the most "Understanding AC guy" of here) has doubt about things. Do you really think that we, fans, should have doubts after a game called Revelations? 16 was the mistery of the games. And he was solved fast and clean. All things he said, all things he does was simply gone in 5 minutes.

Also they said that are gonna be "Key momments" in Altair's life to show us. I think that when he found the keys (If you say that are not him that construct that), apple and write codex so much more important than him killing Abbas.

Altair put Genghis Khan in Codex, so I think this is a little important to stay off a game.


And I'm not even complain about gameplay (Of up and down Masyaf only) and the Abbas. So many characters to be a villain like, Richard Lionheart, Saladin, Genghis Khan and even templars (Maria was one. She should know about others to Altair go after). But no. They put a random character of AC1. But, ok. This is not the point.


The point is the story of the game is going down. AC1 was repetitive but the story was good. AC2 was perfect. ACB was good in Desmond story. Ezio story was poor in ACB. And ACR was "Altair life" = Nothing, Ezio doing things in a game to give a message to Desmond that only him understand (A message that show the end of first civilization. Things that Desmond and us already knew) and show nothing about Revelations. Just throwing away Lucy and Subject 16. 16 they put in a DLC and "Alright, =)" and Lucy was cut off voice, face and everything.


I don't want the third game and the one after became like this. Only gameplay, making holes and making money with dlcs and multiplayer. I (And not only me) want the old AC back. When they care about little details and stuff. Not just kill and kill to make money and make some fans happy.