User blog comment:MB543/The Crimson Polls III: 12/@comment-4786308-20140316140314/@comment-4068211-20140317120858

It's kind of odd to imply that their games are poorly developped because they are being released yearly. Did ACIV not show how good they can be? Also these games aren't in single year cycles, but three year cycles. Just because it goes a year between releases it doesn't show the work being done years previous.

I'm increasingly not fussed over whether a game gets released this year (with the stuff happening on AC Initiates the story is being told anyway and the story is my main interest in AC), but it is a little weird that some of the most frequent Posters on this website are objecting to more games by suggesting that the games produced in the yearly release arer bad...why do people seem to think ACIV was a bad game? That's the implication of saying they should wait a year or two??