Talk:Temple (Isu)
Are these available for PS3 ?????[edit source]
- Nope, they're PSP exclusive. -- Master Sima Yi 13:33, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Brotherhood?[edit source]
In the achievements they speak about shrines, not temples. I also doubt that there would be 6 temples located in one city. The shrines refer (i think) to the sons of romulus liars
(apparently i wasn't logged in, so i sign it anyway)
EXistenZ! 16:52, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
18:09, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- I go with this guy. Whatever he said makes more sense than temples. -- D. Cello 21:59, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
Templar does sounds like temple[edit source]
Templar does sounds like temple. Blix1ms0ns 01:40, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
Coordinates?[edit source]
OK, so someone put in under "Trivia" that if the coordinates are put into Google Earth, a giant chasm is seen. Well, I put in the coordinates in Google Earth, and I don't see any chasms. For me, it's coming up somewhere around the state of New York, which is NOT where the marker shows in the map on the page. So, am I doing something wrong here, or what? Key of Destiny 04:55, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
- You are doing something wrong. The coordinates when I inputed them showed me a hole in the ground near the city of Turin. -- D. Cello 20:12, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
OK, well how did you put in the coordinates? I'd like to see this. Key of Destiny 16:29, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Image request[edit source]
Page could use an image of the temple projected in the Vatican vault - around the time when Minerva speaks of finding the "other temples." =GuardDog 02:54, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
Six Solutions[edit source]
Where was it said the solutions are the Apples? Because that is where the hyperlink leads. -- Vaxis Dec 21 2011 1:08 AM
It appears there is a temple on the Galapagos.. any info on that? Brahamadude (talk) 07:43, August 31, 2013 (UTC) Brahamadude
Seismic Temple[edit source]
While I think that Seismic Pieces of Eden—which by the way is a misnomer—should probably be merged with Seismic Temples, I actually thhink that Seismic Temples should have its own article. The reason is because The Essential Guide describes them as sites distinct from the actual Vaults or Temples; they're built for a completely different purpose. The Vaults were the facilities designed by the Isu for researching and developing solutions to protect them from the First Disaster. The Seismic Temples did not serve this function and were completely different complexes entirely, possibly industrial structures meant to stabilize plate tectonics.
Also, regarding the name "Seismic Temple", while it's confirmed in The Essential Guide, I think we were using it before its publication. I don't recall encountering it in Rogue... I'm just curious if we actually invented the term as conjecture, people followed up on it, and eventually so did Ubisoft. It has happened many times before with Star Wars with Wookieepedia popularizing names that Lucasfilms ended up using... Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 23:47, July 28, 2017 (UTC)
"Temples" to "Isu temple"[edit source]
I just moved the page from "Temples" to "Isu temple". This was long overdue in my honest opinion. A temple in general doesn't necessarily refer to a Precursor site and humans only refer to them as temple colloquially and for lack of an official name as far as I know. In any case, the vast majority of temples in the series are actually human temples even if they're not as central to the narrative. It makes no sense for "temples" to lead directly to the subject of a Precursor site. I, however, was not sure whether it should be called Isu temple or Precursor temple instead or what other name as my only reference book is The Essential Guide which doesn't really attribute a particular name and may also have used this very page as a source. I'm also not sure if "temple" should be capitalized, but it irked me for a very long time that this title made two glaring errors—aside the one already mentioned above, the fact that the title was in the plural. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 07:51, March 5, 2018 (UTC)
- Your reasoning makes sense and I agree (though my vote means nothing, not being an Admin), but *uuuuuuggghh*: not only will we have to change a whole bloody mountain of redirect links, we'll have to sort between in-page links and NavBar box links. It's been done before, like after Syndicate revealed First Civ were actually called Isu, so it's manageable, but still, it's grinding work.
Well, no time like the present! *cracks kuckles* - Darman (talk) 02:21, March 7, 2018 (UTC)- I actually received a suggestion by Jasca Ducato that we should considering moving it to Temple (Isu) instead. I do want to point out that sorting out all the redirect links is not an issue. It does not break anything for redirect links to be leftover even if they're not ideal, and this side-effect is inevitable with pretty much any page move. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 19:45, March 7, 2018 (UTC)