Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-18014300-20170717032044/@comment-18014300-20170717180652

I fear you guys are still missing the point. Under the current system, we are still essentially taking information from Wikipedia, we're just not honest about it. When we say that Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, we mean that we shouldn't be taking from it, and by extension, cite it. But I think the way you guys are seeing it is that we shouldn't cite it, but it's still okay to take from it, which I think is missing the entire point that Wikipedia is an unreliable source.

For example, by Jasca's response especially, I think you misunderstand that I'm insinuating it is fine to source to Wikipedia because it's reliable, when that is the complete opposite of my point.