This page lists all the previous nominations for Good status. Every article nominations listed here have been concluded, and transferred here for reviewing purposes only.
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
A lot of good information -- FIKUS96 15:40, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
Yay
Maybe just reduce those artifacts picture from MyCheats, they're too big. -- D. Cello 15:31, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
Nay
It's just too long plus, it really seems crammed. It has lots of red, non-working links not to mention the debatable "allegiance" system [(A), (T), (!)] as well as redundancy. Silver Mage 11:57, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
@D. Cello: And "My Cheat" should be cutted out from the image...--PhantomT1412 20:44, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
that page is rather messy~ - SilverSummonerTaLk 21:24, January 28, 2010 (UTC)\
Agreed with everything above. The page just looks like an awful mess. It needs some serious reformatting first. -- Reqυiem 23:31, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
Too disorganized, as said above. -- Master Sima Yi 16:28, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
It's kind of messy, and she is a critical character. Unless some serious revamp occurs, her article shall be demoted. -- D. Cello 20:17, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Article has been rewritten, updated, lists are cleaned up, and irrelevant information has been moved/deleted. -- Reqυiem 18:33, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Existing correct information has been reworded to be more cohesive, information has been corrected, new sections with relevant information added.AgentValentine 22:27, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Needs better formatting and more pictures (or at least better arrangement). -- D. Cello 22:46, February 13, 2010 (UTC)~ - pictures rearranged, formatting improved, changing vote
Like he said needs more pictures. ^_^ Spoonodeath 00:09, February 14, 2010 (UTC)-Like the wikipedia link added.
Insert reason for objection hereMasterAssassin217, 19:15, February 18, 2010
Trying again later! --THIEF 02:36, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
This article is one of my most loved ones. XD. It has its faults, the intro may need to be reworded and shortened, but overall it is very informative and describes the swordplay and available tactics in these games to a great detail. --THIEF 06:32, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Huh, I've never seen this article before - quite a shame, since it's quite extensive and detailed. As you said, it could use some polishing, but it's still pretty complete. =GuardDog 11:23, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
You have great taste Thief, cause this page is quite special in it's own right, though I find that they're are some things that can be organized in a better way, it's still great as it is. DanMan7308 21:11, March 28, 2011 (UTC) DanMan7308
To add to all the flaws JD mentioned, for me, it just didn't read well. It was quite descriptive, and had great information, but it seemed as if it could be written and layed out a lot better. -- 'R BlaiddDdraigWolfDragon’s Lair 23:58, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Wow, how could have missed those first 3.. o_o. I'll put this back up here after a revamp. --THIEF 02:30, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
You know the gist. Fully complete, high quality images, well written and linked. Formatting and lack of confidence in this article keeps it from Featured status. XD --THIEF 06:32, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Just read the page, and I really liked it, it was just written so well. It was an all round good read. This page can get its "Good" on. -- 'R BlaiddDdraigWolfDragon’s Lair 08:08, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Well-written and complete. The images are fitting too, though if I remember right, that first image wasn't during the siege of Masyaf, but during the retaking XD Still, it fits. A yay from me. =GuardDog 11:23, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Pretty good article, informative and overall well written. Needs a little bit of work to reach FA but it deserves to be listed as a Good Article. Subject 12 12:00, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
There we go, gave it the awesome War Clown treatment. Big credit goes to Vatsa for the quotes and late night pics. The page was messy as hell and had a lot lacking at first, now this is practically FA material :) --Juan BlancoReception Area 17:23, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Lol, It wasn't messy as hell. XD --THIEF 21:02, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Lacks a few good quotes, and unsourced. Also lacks a few links on some areas of some of the paragraphs. Wow, I haven't voted for "Yay" on any of these nominations. Hah. Not funny. --Juan BlancoReception Area 12:40, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Everyone else thought it was good, glad you changed your mind and fixed what you had "problems" with. Remember that these are "Good" articles, not "Featured". You darn perfectionist! :P --THIEF 05:20, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
Santangel's request/Corombo in Venice[edit source]
Trying again in future. --THIEF 05:22, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
You know the gist. Fully complete, images, worded well to a satisfactory extent. Not "Featured status" because something I can't put my finger on is making the article seem not good enough for it, and simply because the writing of that particular game isn't that good. :D --THIEF 06:32, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah...no. No source, kinda off paragraphing, lacking one good pic, and the infobox pic is...uhhh oO (Yeah, my first time saying Nay. Hooray for me!) --Juan BlancoReception Area 12:32, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Fair enough, the pictures are the best we can get for that game (though it does look like Ezio is doing something dirty there, XD). Someone once told me that Major Event articles didn't need sourcing, guess that person was wrong (figures). Oh well. --THIEF 21:04, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Now renamed Corombo in Venice, I've done a full-blown revamp to the page, starting with the format, pictures, quotes, links. Also sourced, made minor tweaks to the infobox content, and of course, rewrote the info. Let's hope that this time the page will nail it, aye? --WarClownFrequency: 149.94 13:39, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
Informative, sourced and great images. Good job. Vatsa 15:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
Might do a pass of minor rewording, but still, I really like it. Very informative, considering I never played Discovery, and the images are all relevant and useful. Definitely yay. =GuardDog 23:20, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Well written, informative, and has useful pictures. It's a fairly good article. -- 'R BlaiddDdraigWolfDragon’s Lair 23:58, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
