Talk:Masato Yagyu

This is the discussion page for Masato Yagyu. Here, you may discuss improving the article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Be polite Assume good faith Do not insult other people

Unsourced image

This is an unsourced image? LOL. It's exactly the same image, but no background.

• 
  First image
• 
  Image added by me

Oseron (talk) 14:09, December 28, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but you're supposed to mention that in the image description. Also, we generally don't make renders of comic book images.--Bovkaffe (talk) 22:58, December 28, 2017 (UTC)

Unclear BtS note

"For unclear reasons, Seijin is regularly referred to as 'Masato'."

What does this mean? Regularly referred to as "Masato" where? In the comic? If so, how do we know the character's name to be Seijin instead? Does the comic alternate between Seijin and Masato? This note needs to be more informative about the issue. Sol Pacificus^(Cyfiero) 18:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't sure how best to put that bullet point. In Penguin Book's blurb for Volume 1, the protagonist is named as Yanao Seijin, but in an online scan I found of Chapter 1, Masato's name is on the synchronization chart on pg 33 of Chapter 1 and we know Seijin just relived Edward's memories. Rereading it again, though, it might be referring to a "Masato Yagyu" mentioned two pages earlier? I think it's the guy who wakes Seijin, since he doesn't have Saejima's narrow soulpatch and Irene says it when Seijin is walking away at the end of Ch. 1 and can't hear her. – Darman (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

The thing is that the character's given name 聖人 can be read either Seijin or Masato and now I could be wrong, but from what I know of Japanese practice, the right way to read it just depends on the individual themselves (or, you know, the parents who gave them the name). But it sounds like you don't have actual access to the whole comic? We can't really verify this discrepancy you bring up with just an online scan giving a glimpse of a page or two. As the trivia point stands right now, it's really not acceptable because it is so vague and unclear, and you yourself put a {{Cite}} and don't seem to be sure about the point it is raising. Sol Pacificus^(Cyfiero) 19:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)