Assassin's Creed Wiki:Good Article Nominations

Bureau

Nominations Hub

Good article nominations

Featured article nominations

Recruitment

This page lists all the nominations for Good status. The Rifaq monitor this page and the voting process.

---

What makes a Good Article good?

An article must…

• …be well-written and detailed.
• …be unbiased, non-point of view.
• …be sourced with all available references and appearances.
• …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other wiki policies.
• …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags.
• …have a proper lead, with a undetailed résumé of the article's contents.
• …have no more than 6 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
• …have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
• …provide at least one quote on the article.
• …preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles.
• …include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
• …pass review by the Bureau review panel.

If the article meets at least 5 of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination.

---

How to nominate:

1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Good status, putting it at the bottom of the list below.
2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is not good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
4. The article is placed on the Good article list and categorized as such.
5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Bureau supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "Good article."

How to vote:

1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
3. Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have at least 50 mainspace edits.
   1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
4. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
5. Once the article has at least three supporting Bureau votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "Good article." Non-Bureau members are also encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.

Also remember to add {{NomG}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Archives: 1 - 2 - 3

Good Status Nominations

Ezio Auditore da Firenze - Removal - Closed

Page has been revamped and will go up for FA. Has been agreed on by Teller and me. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 15:44, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

I had just looked over this Assassin's article which does not follow 2 of the requirements which are an important aspect to this wiki. It has been tagged with an improvement template which is the Revamp template which means is does not comply with the ACWiki manual of style. As said before, one of the most important aspects of the Wiki. I'm sure you would Nay it if it was just put up for voting and it had this template so I do not see why not if it's already GA status. The template was added by War himself. If you disagree feel free to disagree. Yay As Nominator --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 11:43, January 25, 2012 (UTC) It was pretty good when it was smaller. The sheer amount of information makes it pretty high-maintenance though, and the latter parts especially could use some work. =GuardDog 12:22, January 25, 2012 (UTC) Nay I have to say Nay for the removal. The article only has a good status and it's a mess due to Revelations information which wasn't formatted properly by the users who added. As I see it, it can be improved and promoted to featured, but does not require removal of it's current status.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 12:41, January 25, 2012 (UTC) Comment Though it can be fixed, the Revelations plot was a large part of Ezio's story, it also includes the addition of Embers aswell as dead links and quotes that could've added. --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 12:43, January 25, 2012 (UTC) If no one else beats me to it, I will revamp the page today and tomorrow. I'll leave a message here when I (or someone else) is done, and we can check it over again. It's been way too long since I did something useful here anyway.. Nesty Contact me! 13:56, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

Ottomans

Eight days, five positive and no negative votes. Seems this one made it through. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 03:29, June 12, 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

I nominate this article, my third apprentice task, for the status of GA, with permission from Nesty. I've expanded the article from its previous state, quite a bit actually. The trivia could have more points though. Well, I've done what I can and let's see if you people think it's good enough for GA. Any comments are welcome.--OdranoellutaTalk✲<choose><option>http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel-cinematic-universe/images/1/18/Sig.png</option></choose> 03:49, June 4, 2012 (UTC) Yay As the revamper/nominator.--OdranoellutaTalk✲<choose><option>http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel-cinematic-universe/images/1/18/Sig.png</option></choose> 03:49, June 4, 2012 (UTC) Should probably have said this somewhat sooner, but adding some relevant quotes to the sections might make the article of a higher standard. Nesty Contact me! 07:02, June 4, 2012 (UTC) I gave it a once over, fixed some mistakes and altered some sentences, and now I'm leaving my vote here. :) Slate Vesper 10:26, June 4, 2012 (UTC) Very informative, an easy read and an enjoyable read. Good job Odranoelluta! -- ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 12:52, June 4, 2012 (UTC) Easy to read, good sourcing. A job well done, Odra. Stormbeast The Helpful Place 02:33, June 10, 2012 (UTC) Nay Comments It may just be me, but there are some places that could use more commas. Stormbeast The Helpful Place 02:33, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

Israel Putnam - Voting

I recently did a complete revamp of the article and expanded his biography and added more images and a brief trivia section. In addition, I reworded the article and made it sound more coherent. It could still use some more images, but I had Nesty and Slate look over it and they agreed with me that it's GA. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 20:39, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Yay

1. As nominator. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 20:39, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
2. Article is clean and complete, and seems to live up to Good standards. =GuardDog 00:56, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
3. You must have me confused with someone else...Either way, it has my vote. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 01:17, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
4. -- Nesty ^{Contact me!} 06:27, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Nay

1. Structure is good enough, but not yet how I'd like it to see. Too many sections with too little content in each of them, lacking a lot of relevant quotes, too short of an intro. -- Master Sima Yi _Talk 08:31, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

1. Just an additional confirmation (though I suppose this should more be posed at Kal) is the concept art really of Putnam? I recall that image being on the DLC code for the Benedict Arnold missions. =GuardDog 00:56, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
2. I wondered that myself. I have tried to confirm it but various other non-official sources listed him as Putnam. I haven't seen any Ubisoft sources confirming of refuting it though. :/ sorry. ► Kaloneous ◄ _{♣^HelpDesk♣} 03:55, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
3. Then it might be better to remove it, just to be on the safe side. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 06:27, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
4. Yes, it is indeed on the DLC code for the Benedict Arnold DLC. -- Master Sima Yi _Talk 08:32, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
5. Sima, I addressed the issues you mentioned, please look it over whenever you have time, and reconsider your vote. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 09:17, January 14, 2013 (UTC)