Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Assassin's Creed Wiki:Good Article Nominations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Amnestyyy No edit summary |
imported>Amnestyyy No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<div style="border:2px solid #800000; padding:.5em 1em 1em 1em; border-top:none; background-color:#F2F3F4; color:#000"> | <div style="border:2px solid #800000; padding:.5em 1em 1em 1em; border-top:none; background-color:#F2F3F4; color:#000"> | ||
[[File:Eraicon-good.png|100px|right]] | [[File:Eraicon-good.png|100px|right]] | ||
This page lists all the '''nominations''' for '''Good''' status. The | This page lists all the '''nominations''' for '''Good''' status. The Rafiqs monitor this page and the voting process. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
What makes a Good Article good? | What makes a Good Article good? | ||
<big>An article must…</big>{{Shortcut|AC:GA}} | <big>An article must…</big>{{Shortcut|AC:GA}} | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*…preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles. | *…preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles. | ||
*…include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available. | *…include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available. | ||
*…pass review by the Bureau review panel. | |||
*…pass review by the | |||
If the article meets at least '''5''' of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination. | If the article meets at least '''5''' of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
#Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. | #Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. | ||
#The article is placed on the Good article list and categorized as such. | #The article is placed on the Good article list and categorized as such. | ||
#Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 | #Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Bureau supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "Good article." | ||
<big>''How to vote:''</big> | <big>''How to vote:''</big> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 40: | ||
##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. | ##If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. | ||
#As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. '''Do not strike other users' objections'''; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied. | #As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. '''Do not strike other users' objections'''; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied. | ||
#Once the article has at least three supporting | #Once the article has at least three supporting Bureau votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "Good article." Non-Bureau members are also encouraged to review articles and participate in the process. | ||
Also remember to add <nowiki>{{NomG}}</nowiki> at the top of the article you are nominating. | Also remember to add <nowiki>{{NomG}}</nowiki> at the top of the article you are nominating. | ||
| Line 80: | Line 79: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
#It may just be me, but there are some places that could use more commas. [[User:Stormbeast|<span style="font-family:Euphemia UCAS;font-size:18px;color:#008000;">'''Stormbeast'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Stormbeast|<sup><font color="white">The Helpful Place</font></sup>]] 02:33, June 10, 2012 (UTC) | #It may just be me, but there are some places that could use more commas. [[User:Stormbeast|<span style="font-family:Euphemia UCAS;font-size:18px;color:#008000;">'''Stormbeast'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Stormbeast|<sup><font color="white">The Helpful Place</font></sup>]] 02:33, June 10, 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{voteclosed end}} | {{voteclosed end}}</div> | ||
Revision as of 16:23, 18 July 2012
This page lists all the nominations for Good status. The Rafiqs monitor this page and the voting process.
What makes a Good Article good?
An article must…
- …be well-written and detailed.
- …be unbiased, non-point of view.
- …be sourced with all available references and appearances.
- …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other wiki policies.
- …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags.
- …have a proper lead, with a undetailed résumé of the article's contents.
- …have no more than 6 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
- …have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
- …provide at least one quote on the article.
- …preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles.
- …include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
- …pass review by the Bureau review panel.
If the article meets at least 5 of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination.
How to nominate:
- First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Good status, putting it at the bottom of the list below.
- Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is not good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
- Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
- The article is placed on the Good article list and categorized as such.
- Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Bureau supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "Good article."
How to vote:
- Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
- Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
- Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have at least 50 mainspace edits.
- If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
- As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
- Once the article has at least three supporting Bureau votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "Good article." Non-Bureau members are also encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.
Also remember to add {{NomG}} at the top of the article you are nominating.
Good Status Nominations
Ezio Auditore da Firenze - Removal - Closed
Page has been revamped and will go up for FA. Has been agreed on by Teller and me. Nesty Contact me! 15:44, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Vote closed
Click [show] to view the votes and comments. | |
|---|---|
|
Yay
Nay
Comment
|
Ottomans
Eight days, five positive and no negative votes. Seems this one made it through. Nesty Contact me! 03:29, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
Vote closed
Click [show] to view the votes and comments. | |
|---|---|
|
Yay
NayComments
|