Assassin's Creed Wiki:Good Article Nominations

File:Ganomsistrutt1.png

Bureau

Nominations Hub

Good article nominations

Featured article nominations

Recruitment

This page lists all the nominations for Good status. The Istruttori monitor this page and the voting process.

---

What makes a Good Article good? We knew you would ask that, so the answer follows:

An article must…

• …be well-written and detailed.
• …be unbiased, non-point of view.
• …be sourced with all available references and appearances.
• …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other wiki policies.
• …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags.
• …have a proper lead, with a undetailed résumé of the article's contents.
• …have no more than 6 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
• …have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
• …provide at least one quote on the article.
• …preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles.
• …include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
• …preferably have a "behind the scenes" section where the info if available.
• …pass review by the Istruttorium review panel.

If the article meets at least 5 of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination.

---

How to nominate:

1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Good status, putting it at the bottom of the list below.
2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is not good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
4. The article is placed on the Good article list and categorized as such.
5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Istruttore supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "Good article."

How to vote:

1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
3. Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have at least 50 mainspace edits.
   1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
4. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
5. Once the article has at least three supporting Istruttori votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "Good article." Although articles do not need regular users' votes to pass, non-Istruttori are encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.

Also remember to add {{NomG}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Archives: 1 - 2 - 3

Good Status Nominations

Ezio Auditore da Firenze - Removal - Closed

Page has been revamped and will go up for FA. Has been agreed on by Teller and me. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 15:44, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

I had just looked over this Assassin's article which does not follow 2 of the requirements which are an important aspect to this wiki. It has been tagged with an improvement template which is the Revamp template which means is does not comply with the ACWiki manual of style. As said before, one of the most important aspects of the Wiki. I'm sure you would Nay it if it was just put up for voting and it had this template so I do not see why not if it's already GA status. The template was added by War himself. If you disagree feel free to disagree. Yay As Nominator --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 11:43, January 25, 2012 (UTC) It was pretty good when it was smaller. The sheer amount of information makes it pretty high-maintenance though, and the latter parts especially could use some work. =GuardDog 12:22, January 25, 2012 (UTC) Nay I have to say Nay for the removal. The article only has a good status and it's a mess due to Revelations information which wasn't formatted properly by the users who added. As I see it, it can be improved and promoted to featured, but does not require removal of it's current status.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 12:41, January 25, 2012 (UTC) Comment Though it can be fixed, the Revelations plot was a large part of Ezio's story, it also includes the addition of Embers aswell as dead links and quotes that could've added. --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 12:43, January 25, 2012 (UTC) If no one else beats me to it, I will revamp the page today and tomorrow. I'll leave a message here when I (or someone else) is done, and we can check it over again. It's been way too long since I did something useful here anyway.. Nesty Contact me! 13:56, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

Ottomans

I nominate this article, my third apprentice task, for the status of GA, with permission from Nesty. I've expanded the article from its previous state, quite a bit actually. The trivia could have more points though. Well, I've done what I can and let's see if you people think it's good enough for GA. Any comments are welcome.--Odranoelluta^{Talk✲<choose><option>http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel-cinematic-universe/images/1/18/Sig.png</option></choose>} 03:49, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Yay

1. As the revamper/nominator.--Odranoelluta^{Talk✲<choose><option>http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel-cinematic-universe/images/1/18/Sig.png</option></choose>} 03:49, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
2. Should probably have said this somewhat sooner, but adding some relevant quotes to the sections might make the article of a higher standard. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 07:02, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. I gave it a once over, fixed some mistakes and altered some sentences, and now I'm leaving my vote here. :) Slate Vesper 10:26, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
4. Very informative, an easy read and an enjoyable read. Good job Odranoelluta! -- ► Kaloneous ◄ _{♣^HelpDesk♣} 12:52, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Nay

Comments