--[[User:Vatsa1708|<tt>'''Vatsa'''</tt>]] (<small>[[User talk:Vatsa1708|talk]] • [[w::c:prototype|Gentek]]</small>) 02:58, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
{{Voteclosed}}
Built the article from the ground up, think it's decent enough for a GA. Any issues with it, let me know. Cheers. [[User:Toppers|Toppers]] 23:59, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
Built the article from the ground up, think it's decent enough for a GA. Any issues with it, let me know. Cheers. [[User:Toppers|Toppers]] 23:59, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
===Yay===
===Yay===
Line 293:
Line 297:
#<strike>Could use a longer Aftermath section. --[[User:War Clown|<span style="font-family:Lucida Sans Typewriter;font-size:15px;color:#BFBFBF;">'''Jack'''</span>]] [[User talk:War Clown|<sup><font color="white">'''Walls'''</font></sup>]]<sub>[[w:c:infamous|<font color="#FFF700">Supermen</font>]]</sub> 19:01, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
#<strike>Could use a longer Aftermath section. --[[User:War Clown|<span style="font-family:Lucida Sans Typewriter;font-size:15px;color:#BFBFBF;">'''Jack'''</span>]] [[User talk:War Clown|<sup><font color="white">'''Walls'''</font></sup>]]<sub>[[w:c:infamous|<font color="#FFF700">Supermen</font>]]</sub> 19:01, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
#War, I expanded the aftermath section a little... there just isn't more to it than this... [[User:Amnestyyy|<span style="font-family:Blackadder ITC;font-size:19px;color:#FF033E;">'''Nesty'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Amnestyyy|<sup><span style="font-family:FlamencoD;color:#9966CC;">Contact me!</span></sup>]] 10:33, December 31, 2011 (UTC)</strike>
#War, I expanded the aftermath section a little... there just isn't more to it than this... [[User:Amnestyyy|<span style="font-family:Blackadder ITC;font-size:19px;color:#FF033E;">'''Nesty'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Amnestyyy|<sup><span style="font-family:FlamencoD;color:#9966CC;">Contact me!</span></sup>]] 10:33, December 31, 2011 (UTC)</strike>
…be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
…follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on ACWiki.
…not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags, except {{FAimp}}.
…have a proper lead, with a undetailed resume of the article's contents.
…have no more than 6 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
…have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
…provide at least one quote on the article.
…preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles.
…include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
…preferably have a "behind the scenes" section when the info if available
…pass review by the Istruttorium review panel.
If the article meets at least 5 of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination.
How to nominate:
First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
The article is placed on the good article list and added to the front page queue.
Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Istruttore supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "good article."
How to vote:
Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have 50 mainspace edits.
If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under, if possible. Failure to do so may result in your objection being considered invalid.
As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
Once the article has five supporting Istruttori votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "good article." Although articles do not need regular users' votes to pass, non-Istruttori are encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.
Also remember to add {{NomG}} at the top of the article you are nominating.
6 days and 5 Staff votes.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 03:07, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
I seem to be rushing these articles through, but seeing as they all seem to do quite well in the voting process, I see no reason to stop my work yet. I fixed the final words section, sourced the images, removed the unneeded video, replaced some images and did some general rewording. I think this one is good enough for GA as well. NestyContact me! 08:43, November 24, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
As nominator/revamper. NestyContact me! 08:43, November 24, 2011 (UTC)
Another one, again? --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 13:00, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Another nomination from me. I have fixed the articles sourcing, sourced images, added new images (Thanks to Vatsa), cleaned up the trivia, fixed the formatting in the final words section, fixed some info in the infobox and did the general rewording. I believe it to be ready, if you do not, tell me why and I'll see to it that it's fixed. NestyContact me! 22:07, November 26, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
As nominator/revamper NestyContact me! 22:07, November 26, 2011 (UTC)
Enough votes. -- D. Cello 00:14, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
I revamped and expanded on this article, adding personality and early life sections, as well as cleaning up the rest of the article. I've spoken with Guard, and he agrees after a few suggestions. NostalgiaLet's talk. 15:10, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Sometimes I get a good feeling about this article. Elchzard(Talking is fun) 21:03, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Oh dear, another one? Yes. Another one. Let's see.... I did pretty much the same as I did to the other articles. Go ahead and vote. If you don't think it is good enough, tell me why and I'll make sure to fix it. NestyContact me! 19:41, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
As revamper/nominator NestyContact me! 19:41, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
My comments have been covered. NostalgiaLet's talk. 21:20, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Wording is good, good images. I believe it to be worthy. --TellerWords, On my Screen :O 20:04, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Niiceee.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 02:05, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Nay
Comments
In my opinion the biography section needs to be subdivided, and the opening quote for that section needs to either be shortened (or replaced if it loses its meaning when shortened). It could also use some more images from when William is inside the citadel for the gallery. Lastly, I believe that the image from the final words section should be made smaller, and a medium sized image inserted into the personality section, if it makes sense there. Those are just my thoughts on the article, but do those, and I'll vote Yay. NostalgiaLet's talk. 03:21, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
I did as you asked, mostly. Biography has been subdivided, quote has been replaced by a shorter one, though it gives less explanation. Final death image has been made smaller as well. An image in the personality section would both be senseless and would ruin the articles lay-out unnecessarily. I'll request more images from Vatsa when I meet him on the IRC. NestyContact me! 08:38, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Oooooooh. The criteria met here are giving me a good feeling. Elchzard(T)21:21, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Same story as the ones above. did everything I did to them, and if you are not content, tell me why so that I can fix it. NestyContact me! 09:19, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
As revamper/nominator --NestyContact me! 09:19, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
Good wording (for a tyrant at least), but seriously, good job Nesty (and the others who helped with these pages). These pages are worthy. --TellerWords, On my Screen :O 20:08, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, didn't serve the Templar cause and yet kept around to instill fear. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 02:05, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Looks good now, with some rewording done by Nesty and some HQ images provided by Vatsa. NostalgiaLet's talk. 02:10, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Yay, a good read and great images. -- ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 05:40, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Nay
Most of the wording on the page is quite awkward to read, it doesn't seem to flow very well. -- 'R BlaiddDdraigEnter... THE SCARY DOOR 04:54, December 3, 2011 (UTC
As War and Blaidd have said, the gallery needs some new, higher quality images that provide a better visual for the article. Also, the wording does seem awkward to read and just appears "difficult" to read, if that makes sense. Honestly, I wish I could be more descriptive, but it's difficult even for myself to pinpoint exactly where the wording needs improvement, so I apologize for that. NostalgiaLet's talk. 04:59, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
I've done some work, but it could use some new images. The ones there are a bit low quality, and could also use some more for the gallery. If what I've requested are met, I'll vote Yay. --JackWallsSupermen 03:33, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
I did a lot of rewording on the page, so I hope that objections is fixed now. I have requested new images from Vatsa (we all know they'll be good quality), and I will put them on the page as soon as he has uploaded them. Once I have, I'll leave another comment here. --NestyContact me! 10:34, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Vatsa has added the images, as requested. Please check the page again and reconsider your votes. NestyContact me! 19:06, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
The page looks good now, except the image for the "Personality" section now appears low-quality in comparison to the images from the rest of the article, at least to me (No offense Cello :P.). If you add a Vatsa image of Majd's death, or are able to acquire a higher-quality image of the death of Majd, I'd gladly vote Yay on this article. NostalgiaLet's talk. 22:33, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Replaced one of the images from gallery and moved the assassination image. That's what happens when a jpg format is displayed along pngs.. XD --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 02:05, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
I guess I'm driving everyone here insane with my nominations, but here's another one. Chief Scholar of Damascus has been revamped as well. Did the same to him as to the others. Opinions, please! NestyContact me! 13:28, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
As revamper/nominator NestyContact me! 13:28, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
Closing vote as per nominator's request.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 14:57, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Good article. Good formatting, quotes, high quality pictures and written well. Credit goes to Toppers. Assassin-Rome(Talk if you will) 20:50, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
I slightly expanded the aftermath section. You have my vote. NestyContact me! 10:38, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Nay
Comments
Aftermath section could use some expansion. I do agree it is written well, but yeah, expand the Aftermath abit and then I'll vote "Yay" TellerWords, On my Screen :O 10:39, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
As Teller said, the article does look good, but the Aftermath section needs expansion. Add to that section, and you'll get my vote. Nostalgia ACLet's talk. 15:06, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Aftermath section has had a slight expansion, please have a look and reconsider your vote. NestyContact me! 10:38, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
I believe this article can be shortened (I see a lot of unnecessary stuff there). Could use better quotes. Also better wording. If those are met, I might just vote. --JackWallsSupermen 11:22, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
What I do, I do for... --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 15:33, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
The last of the nine AC1 targets to reach GA. I have, once again, did everything I could, hoping it is good enough for you guys. If not, let me know and I'll fix it. NestyContact me! 14:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
As revamper/nominator NestyContact me! 14:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations on getting all these to GA. I assume the Templars from ACII are next? =P -- 'R BlaiddDdraigEnter... THE SCARY DOOR 04:14, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Seems to be right on target, nice job Nesty. SubtlePenUp to chat? 17:43, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Great work and, as Blaidd said, congratulations. Half the Templars from ACII are already done for you. XD --TellerWords, On my Screen :O 18:49, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
As both Teller and Blaidd have said, congratulations Nesty. These targets are now all well-written and complete articles with some great images. Nostalgia ACLet's talk. 21:09, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Sure, good images, complete info. =GuardDog 03:30, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
He does look like a turtle.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 15:33, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
What? Really? You thought I was done already? Not even close! I think our lovable, murderous doctor is ready for his spot in the GA-gallery.
Yay
As revamper/nominator NestyContact me! 14:07, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
I enjoy birds, and this man bears a striking resemblance to one. All in all a very well written article. Subject 12Talk to me 14:21, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
The doctor has been doctored well; a yes from me. SubtlePenUp to chat? 17:41, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Do I remove the mask to close his eyes or do I just leave. Nah, screw it, I'll leave it. --TellerWords, On my Screen :O 18:49, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
He took a leap of faith a still survived.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 03:41, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
I've done some major expansion and addition of multiple sections to the article. I've also "touched up" the rest of the article, with a good amount of rewording, removal of bad images, and just general clean up. I believe it's GA worthy, so let's vote. Nostalgia ACLet's talk. 21:39, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
No complaints from me. =GuardDog 03:30, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
Better. Not perfect, but good enough. NestyContact me! 04:57, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
Took his time to die. Kept jumping off the tower.. o_O --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 03:41, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
Nay
Could do with a little more rewording. It's almost there, but not entirely. If you see to this, I might change my vote. NestyContact me! 21:59, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
And it's a hoooome run! --JackWallsSupermen 19:46, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Brother Ristoro, the Minim priest. Not my best job, but I think it is good enough for GA now. I reworded, added a P&C section and did some more general work. Good enough? Vote Yay. Not good enough? Tell me why, and I'll make it so. NestyContact me! 17:19, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
As revamper/nominator NestyContact me! 17:19, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Been here long enough.. --Vatsa (talk • Gentek) 14:57, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
I've revamped and reworded most of the page, adding a personality and trivia sections as well. I also got Vatsa to provide me with a nice new high-quality image. That being said, I'll admit that it's not my best work, though I believe it can work as GA. If you think differently, please leave a comment why :P, thanks guys. Nostalgia ACLet's talk. 20:29, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.
Built the article from the ground up, think it's decent enough for a GA. Any issues with it, let me know. Cheers. Toppers 23:59, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
She was a courtesan, an Assassin, a Templar... all kinds of stuff... Now let's make her a Good article as well. NestyContact me! 10:25, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
Yay
Revamper/nominator NestyContact me! 10:25, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
Yay. Reads well and is very informative. -- ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 14:50, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
