Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Assassin's Creed Wiki:Good Article Nominations: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>TheSt0ryTeller
imported>Amnestyyy
Line 583: Line 583:
#As nominator, and as a user who did a good amount of work on this article. [[User:Nostalgia AC|<span style="font-family:Constantia;font-size:18px;color:#00A300;">'''Nostalgia AC'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Nostalgia AC|<sup><span style="font-family:Constantia;color:#000000;">Let's talk</span></sup>]] 06:24, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
#As nominator, and as a user who did a good amount of work on this article. [[User:Nostalgia AC|<span style="font-family:Constantia;font-size:18px;color:#00A300;">'''Nostalgia AC'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Nostalgia AC|<sup><span style="font-family:Constantia;color:#000000;">Let's talk</span></sup>]] 06:24, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
#After the suggestions were implemented, article seems complete and worthy now. =[[User:GuardDog|GuardDog]] 09:55, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
#After the suggestions were implemented, article seems complete and worthy now. =[[User:GuardDog|GuardDog]] 09:55, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
#That's a lot better. [[User:Amnestyyy|<span style="font-family:Blackadder ITC;font-size:19px;color:#FF033E;">'''Nesty'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Amnestyyy|<sup><span style="font-family:FlamencoD;color:#9966CC;">Contact me!</span></sup>]] 15:48, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


===Nay===
===Nay===
#Nice try, but I didn't like the way it flowed. -- [[User:'R BlaiddDdraig|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;font-size:19px;color:Grey;">'R BlaiddDdraig</span>]] [[User Talk:'R BlaiddDdraig|<sup><span style="font-family:FrankRuehl;color:#76FF7A">Enter... '''<big>THE SCARY DOOR</big>'''</span></sup>]] 06:42, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
#Nice try, but I didn't like the way it flowed. -- [[User:'R BlaiddDdraig|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;font-size:19px;color:Grey;">'R BlaiddDdraig</span>]] [[User Talk:'R BlaiddDdraig|<sup><span style="font-family:FrankRuehl;color:#76FF7A">Enter... '''<big>THE SCARY DOOR</big>'''</span></sup>]] 06:42, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
===Comments===
===Comments===
#Could do with some rewording to make the article more coherent... If you do that, I'll vote Yay. [[User:Amnestyyy|<span style="font-family:Century Schoolbook;font-size:19px;color:#FF033E;">'''Nesty'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Amnestyyy|<sup><span style="font-family:Gill Sans MS;color:#9966CC;">Wanna talk?</span></sup>]] 08:51, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
#<strike>Could do with some rewording to make the article more coherent... If you do that, I'll vote Yay. [[User:Amnestyyy|<span style="font-family:Century Schoolbook;font-size:19px;color:#FF033E;">'''Nesty'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Amnestyyy|<sup><span style="font-family:Gill Sans MS;color:#9966CC;">Wanna talk?</span></sup>]] 08:51, November 20, 2011 (UTC)</strike>
#I reworked parts of the article according to suggestions from [[User:GuardDog|Guard]], so please look over it again, Blaidd and Nesty, and see whether its worthy of GA now. [[User:Nostalgia AC|<span style="font-family:Constantia;font-size:18px;color:#00A300;">'''Nostalgia AC'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Nostalgia AC|<sup><span style="font-family:Constantia;color:#000000;">Let's talk</span></sup>]] 04:23, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
#I reworked parts of the article according to suggestions from [[User:GuardDog|Guard]], so please look over it again, Blaidd and Nesty, and see whether its worthy of GA now. [[User:Nostalgia AC|<span style="font-family:Constantia;font-size:18px;color:#00A300;">'''Nostalgia AC'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Nostalgia AC|<sup><span style="font-family:Constantia;color:#000000;">Let's talk</span></sup>]] 04:23, November 23, 2011 (UTC)



Revision as of 17:49, 23 November 2011

File:Ganomsistrutt1.png
           

This page lists all the nominations for Good status. The Istruttori monitor this page and the voting process.


What makes an Good Article good? We knew you would ask that, so the answer follows:

An article must…

  • …be well-written and detailed.
  • …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  • …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  • …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on ACWiki.
  • …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags, except {{FAimp}}.
  • …have a proper lead, with a undetailed resume of the article's contents.
  • …have no more than 6 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
  • …have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
  • …provide at least one quote on the article.
  • …preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles.
  • …include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  • …preferably have a "behind the scenes" section when the info is avaiable
  • …pass review by the Istruttorium review panel.

If the article meets at least 5 of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination.


How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the good article list and added to the front page queue.
  5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Istruttore supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "good article."

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
  3. Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have 50 mainspace edits.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under, if possible. Failure to do so may result in your objection being considered invalid.
  4. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  5. Once the article has five supporting Istruttori votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "good article." Although articles do not need regular users' votes to pass, non-Istruttori are encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.

Also remember to add {{NomG}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Archives: 1 - 2 - 3

Nikolai Orelov - Yay

Molodtsy. Pozdravlyaem Nikolaya. --Juan BlancoReception Area 11:13, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Return to Alep - Yay

Great! :D --Juan BlancoReception Area 12:21, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Search for the Apple - Yay

Holy shit. Took you guys this long? --WarClown Frequency: 149.94 08:51, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Bartolomeo d'Alviano - Yay

Finally. Subject 12 12:47, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

The Codex's journey - Yay

An article worthy of Good status, sourced, photographed and quoted with good grammar and structures. -- Rayne Message 05:19, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Daniel Cross - Nay

Needs a personality section. Subject 12 11:27, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Al Mualim - Yay

About time. --VatsaGentek 04:10, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Hidden Blade - Yay

Worth it, and hope it makes FA. --VatsaGentek 03:59, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Assassins - Yay

Next stop, FA maybe. --VatsaGentek 09:44, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Apples of Eden - Yay

Shiny Apples.. --VatsaGentek 15:13, August 14, 2011 (UTC)

Robert de Sable - Yay

Least he got a GA. --VatsaGentek 09:44, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Giovanni Borgia - Yay

Has the required number of votes. --VatsaGentek 02:48, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Malik Al-Sayf - Nay

Perhaps something from the encyclopedia. --VatsaGentek 11:22, October 1, 2011 (UTC)

Rise and fall of Altaïr - Nay

Nay. Article needs big improvement before it can reach GA. Assassino de Roma 21:46, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Marco Barbarigo - Yay

Stefano da Bagnone - Yay

Vatsa Gentek 04:46, October 6, 2011 (UTC)

Bernardo Baroncelli - Yay

Vatsa Gentek 04:46, October 6, 2011 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed: Bloodlines - Yay

It's done. --Vatsa (talkGentek) 05:58, October 25, 2011 (UTC)


Auditore execution - Yay

Another one. --Vatsa (talkGentek) 05:58, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Uberto Alberti - Yay

War gave the article the final push it needed to achieve GA! Nostalgia AC Let's talk 13:47, October 15, 2011 (UTC)

Francesco Salviati - Yay

<Insert witty comment here while reading.> --Vatsa (talkGentek) 02:47, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

Micheletto Corella - Yay

FA? --Vatsa (talkGentek) 02:47, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

Carlo Grimaldi - Yay

An assassin of sorts. --Vatsa (talkGentek) 04:10, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Silvio Barbarigo - Yay

Time to close. --Vatsa (talkGentek) 04:10, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Kadar Al-Sayf - Yay

3 votes from Staff, been over a week. It seems as if people had forgotten about the Article. But no less, it's worthy and now officially GA. Give credit where it's due. --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 21:24, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

Angelo Ambrogini - Yay

It's worthy. Votes from Staff and regular users. WORTHY --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 21:24, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

Garnier de Naplouse - Yay

By the power invested in me, on the site of Assassin's Creed Wiki, I now pronounce you Good Article Status. Just remember to give Credit where it's due and such. --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 21:20, November 21, 2011 (UTC)

Francesco de' Pazzi - Voting

I revamped this article earlier tonight, and did some work on it. I reworded most of the paragraphs, added and replaced some images, expanded certain sections, among other things. I believe it's worthy of Good Article status, so let's vote. Nostalgia AC Let's talk 06:24, November 19, 2011 (UTC)

Yay

  1. As nominator, and as a user who did a good amount of work on this article. Nostalgia AC Let's talk 06:24, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
  2. After the suggestions were implemented, article seems complete and worthy now. =GuardDog 09:55, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
  3. That's a lot better. Nesty Contact me! 15:48, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Nay

  1. Nice try, but I didn't like the way it flowed. -- 'R BlaiddDdraig Enter... THE SCARY DOOR 06:42, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  1. Could do with some rewording to make the article more coherent... If you do that, I'll vote Yay. Nesty Wanna talk? 08:51, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I reworked parts of the article according to suggestions from Guard, so please look over it again, Blaidd and Nesty, and see whether its worthy of GA now. Nostalgia AC Let's talk 04:23, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Tamir - Voting

I revamped the page, and seeing as all the information and relevant images are there, I figured I'd nominate it and see how far it gets. I will improve the article once people give feedback (upon voting nay, I'd assume) Nesty Contact me! 21:04, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

Yay

  1. As nominator/revamper Nesty Contact me! 21:04, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I think it's pretty good. Some rewording would make it better, but this isn't being nominated for FA so it doesn't really matter. -- 'R BlaiddDdraig Enter... THE SCARY DOOR 01:27, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Did some minor rewording, though the images work well and information seems complete. =GuardDog 09:55, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Looks good. --Teller Words, On my Screen :O 09:58, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Nay

Comments