Assassin's Creed Wiki:Featured Article Nominations

Bureau

Nominations Hub

Good article nominations

Featured article nominations

Recruitment

This page lists all the nominations for Featured status. The Rafiqan monitor this page and the voting process.

---

Featured is the highest level an article can achieve, and as such, it must meet certain requirements.

• …be well-written and detailed.
• …be unbiased, non-point of view.
• …be sourced with all available references and appearances.
• …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other wiki policies.
• …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags.
• …have a proper lead, with a undetailed résumé of the article's contents.
• …have no more than 6 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
• …have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
• …provide at least one quote on the article.
• …preferably include a "personality and characteristics" section on all character articles.
• …include at least 2 images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
• …pass review by the Bureau review panel.

If the article meets at least 5 of the prerequisites, the article is permitted to be held for nomination.

---

How to nominate:

1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of Featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below.
2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is not good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
4. The article is placed on the Featured article list and categorized as such.
5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 Bureau supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "Featured article."

How to vote:

1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
3. Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have at least 50 mainspace edits.
   1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
4. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
5. Once the article has at least five supporting Bureau votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "Featured article." Non-Bureau members are also encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.

Also remember to add {{NomF}}at the top of the article you are nominating.

Archives: 1 – 2 – 3 – 4

Featured Status Nominations

Octavian de Valois - Yay

It's been a week now, and we have seven Yay's and zero Nay's. Nesty ^{Contact me!}19:36, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

The article was already in a pretty good shape, so I only had to do some minor cleaning up. I think it's ready now, but if you disagree, please let me know and I will fix whatever complaint you have. Thanks for voting, people :) Nesty Contact me! 09:13, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Yay As revamper and nominator. Nesty Contact me! 09:13, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Let's feature the Frenchy. :P Slate Vesper (talk) 16:38, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Thumbs up* -- IlMualim Wanna Chat? 17:01, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Why not? It's in good shape. Crimson Knight Intercom 17:04, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Oui, il a mon vote. -- ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 17:06, September 4, 2012 (UTC) From what I can see, it fits the requirements. Thumbs up from GI. ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 17:07, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Looks good to me. =GuardDog 22:22, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Nay Comments

Dilara - Yay

Another week has passed, and once again there have been no nay-sayers. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 13:45, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed Click [show] to view the votes and comments.

So... Dilara. Go ahead and start voting people! If something is wrong, not good enough, or not pretty enough, feel free to let me know and I'll fix it up. That's all, I think.. Nesty Contact me! 10:59, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Yay As revamper and nominator. Nesty Contact me! 10:59, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Wow, I learned a lot more about her character than I thought I knew. An informative read. -- ► Kaloneous ◄ ♣HelpDesk♣ 12:20, September 12, 2012 (UTC) This page seems a lot more active when Nesty's around ;) ~ GI Auditore Comms Channel 12:57, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Yay from me as well, the quotes in particular seem well placed. =GuardDog 13:08, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Really good, I learnt quite a bit too :) KaiserC (talk) 16:52, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Nay Comments On a side note, Nesty, would you mind if I gave myself a UserFA template for this article if it passes? I did a revamp to it back in January, and wrote more than half the content :) (Just asking, as you have the responsibility as nominator.) =GuardDog 13:08, September 12, 2012 (UTC) Of course, Guard. Anyone who did a substantial amount of work on the page has the right to use the userbox. :) Nesty Contact me! 13:32, September 12, 2012 (UTC)

Ratonhnhaké:ton

Big and important page for the wiki. If you vote nay, let me know why so I can fix it. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 17:39, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Yay

1. As revamper and nominator. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 17:39, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
2. -- IlMualim ^{Wanna Chat?} 01:16, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
3. Looks good to me. ~ GI Auditore ^{Comms Channel} 09:12, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
4. Looking good :) ► Kaloneous ◄ _{♣^HelpDesk♣} 23:01, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
5. There we go. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 23:08, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
6. Given that I went over it and made some corrections, I figure that I should put my support down here. ;) Slate Vesper (talk) 03:44, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
7. Stormbeast gives his approval for this nomination. Following this vote, Stormbeast will stop talking in the third person. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 00:21, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

Nay

Comments

• It needs some more images (specifically towards the end of his biography and subsequent sections), and the main quote needs to be shortened. Fix those things and I'll lend a Yay vote. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 22:18, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
• Please take another look - shortened the main quote and Kain added images. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 11:42, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
• Main quote looks good now, though the personality and legacy sections still need more images. Also, the traitor at West Point part of the biography could use some images--if any are available. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 22:10, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
• Yeah, I know - problem is, there aren't any since it's a PS exclusive DLC and no one seems to be capable of taking proper quality images of the PS. And I removed the Romantic Life section, seeing as we don't need an entire section just to say that he didn't have any. Nesty ^{Contact me!} 04:20, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Villa Auditore

Just finished a merge/expansion on this and Nesty said I should nominate it for FA once done. This is my first time revamping something to FA so please suggest any improvements I could make. :) ~ GI Auditore ^{Comms Channel} 11:27, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Yay

1. As revamper and nominator. ~ GI Auditore ^{Comms Channel} 11:27, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
2. Needed some work with sourcing and stuff, but it's thorough and has good images. --NOSTALGIA ^TALK 22:31, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
3. Stormbeast lied... Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 00:21, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
4. Slate Vesper (talk) 02:43, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
5. You show great potential, GI. and thanks for taking this project off my hands Nesty ^{Contact me!} 10:56, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
6. Auditore5 sì? 13:00, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
7. yay The Dark Soul (talk) 15:09, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

Nay

Comments