Talk:Ezio's Apple of Eden: Difference between revisions
imported>A Black Rabbit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: <br />I didn't at first, only because it was in the developing stages and there with issues with the pages existance (which are hopefully solved?). I can add it.. and probably begin moving over the pertenant First Apple history stuff that is more attributed to the Sixth. -- [[User:A Black Rabbit|A Black Rabbit]] 09:03, December 6, 2010 (UTC) | : <br />I didn't at first, only because it was in the developing stages and there with issues with the pages existance (which are hopefully solved?). I can add it.. and probably begin moving over the pertenant First Apple history stuff that is more attributed to the Sixth. -- [[User:A Black Rabbit|A Black Rabbit]] 09:03, December 6, 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Other Owners?== | |||
Could not we Assume that this "sixth apple" is rather one of the five previously mentioned as it was found in the ark of the covenant? I mean just thinking logically... doesn't that mean its the same one Moses found? I'm sure he had a numbered one... Also Al Mualim mentions Jesus used it and so did many others. Or are we gonna stick with "Sixth"? | |||
<u> | |||
</u> | |||
Revision as of 13:41, 6 December 2010
Who is Neutral?
I took out Napoleon and Houdini, seeing as the Glyphs puzzles indicate that is the First Apple? I also took out Abel and Cain and "Adam" and "Eve". For the former, do we know for sure its the same Apple that Cain killed Abel for? Does the corresponding Glyph puzzle indicate anything? For the latter, I'm inclined to put them in the Assassin category. If not, it should at least be debateable (if it //is// the same Apple, although I'm inclined to agree because the only Apple you actually see is //this// Apple), because the current (and probably correct) theory is that Adam and Eve are one of the progenitors of the Assassins. Thoughts? -- A Black Rabbit 23:42, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
What the hell!?
- Where the hell has this come from? --Jasca Ducato Council Chamber Assassination record 11:11, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Seeing as the Apple held by Altaïr and Ezio is clearly not the First Apple, nor any of the other ones, we had to make a different article for that one. So we made it into "Sixth Apple". Though let us now if you have a better suggestion. :) -- Master Sima Yi 13:58, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- The apple ezio and altair use, has been buried under the colloseum for 500 years: from where ezio left it untill desmond picked it up. Therefore, i can not have been used throughout history like the glyphs tend to tell. So the apple that desmond finds, can not be nr.1, 2,3,4 or 5. So there has to be at least one extra, what we call the sixth. Also remember the map at the end of ACI, that showed many more pieces of eden
- EXistenZ! 14:34, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- The term "Sixth Apple" is effectively a fandom chosen name, however not necessarily an inaccurate one. As it's already been stated why, unless this is a huge error on Ubisoft's part, they have to be two separate Apples. I'm personally on the side of "this wasn't an oversight on Ubisoft's part". I suppose "Altair's" or "Ezio's" Apple would also work, but then again, a number of people have held the Apple over the years until Ezio's placement of it in the Renaissance. -- A Black Rabbit 22:58, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I've just sent the com dev a question about the apple. I've also asked about when Shaun and Rebecca suddenly disappear in the final scene. The Eagle1701 06:44, December 4, 2010 (UTC)
Add to template?
"Sixth Apple (?)" should be added to the Pieces of Eden template so that people can gain a little more clarity on the issues between PoE 1 and the in-game PoE. Also, shouldn't Crystal Skull be added as well since Project Legacy has confirmed the easter egg from AC1's email? - Vaxis, 12:26 CST December 5 2010
I didn't at first, only because it was in the developing stages and there with issues with the pages existance (which are hopefully solved?). I can add it.. and probably begin moving over the pertenant First Apple history stuff that is more attributed to the Sixth. -- A Black Rabbit 09:03, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
Other Owners?
Could not we Assume that this "sixth apple" is rather one of the five previously mentioned as it was found in the ark of the covenant? I mean just thinking logically... doesn't that mean its the same one Moses found? I'm sure he had a numbered one... Also Al Mualim mentions Jesus used it and so did many others. Or are we gonna stick with "Sixth"?