Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Apple of Eden 2: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Master Sima Yi
Line 34: Line 34:


:Alan Rikkin's email in the first ''Assassin's Creed'' calls Altaïr's Apple the "no. 2" and Elizabeth's Apple is called Piece of Eden #2 in the Glyphs in ''Assassin's Creed II''. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 18:59, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
:Alan Rikkin's email in the first ''Assassin's Creed'' calls Altaïr's Apple the "no. 2" and Elizabeth's Apple is called Piece of Eden #2 in the Glyphs in ''Assassin's Creed II''. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 18:59, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
== missing Owner?/edit deletion ==
My friends and I find it highly unlikely that the second apple could ever find its way into the hands of mahatma ghandi without someone bringing it to india. can somebody look at Geop's analysis of the apples of eden and find a reason why I can't add that the apple was probably owned by the East india Trading company before it got to ghandi? [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJdDEWkVSlU&feature=plcp The analysis.] skip to 10:00 . seriously, I'd like a reasonable explination, because my last edit was reverted without reason given. [[Special:Contributions/98.18.48.41|98.18.48.41]] 19:52, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:52, 3 June 2012

Two things:

  • First, as I said on the talk page for the first Apple, the e-mails in AC1 indicate that this is the one possessed by Altair and Ezio.
  • Second, there's no particular evidence that Mary I ever had a Piece of Eden. While the fact that Elizabeth I had the second Apple means that it's not unlikely, all we know is that Mary was killed by the Assassins.


98.192.42.30 19:14, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Then change it and source it. -- Master Sima Yi 19:47, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Name

Shouldn't this page be called the Second Apple of Eden? {{SUBST:User:Soldier Flame/Sig|08:32,11/19/2011}} 08:32, November 19, 2011 (UTC)


Now that we know Altair and Ezio had different apples, it would be much more suggestive if we renamed this to Altair's Apple, A lot more people know who this apples belong rather than their number. Just a suggestion Killeras 20:19, November 27, 2011 (UTC)

It's too confusing to have some Apples with numbers, and some with just names. We use the term "Second Apple" because we know from a glyph that it is called PoE 2. Ezio's Apple is named as such because it has not yet been given a number. If it ever did get one, we would probably use it. We use official names whenever possible -- Vaxis Dec 2 2011 10:15 PM

How did Queen Elizabeth I get the apple?

I know its said it the glyph but she must have got it very soon after ezio got it, since i think she was queen when ezio was in constantiople or about to be, so by this painting which was done when she was not to long queen, she must have got it withing 10 years form ezio looknig at it?Bobemor 16:53, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not really sure what happened here, I think maybe I'm missing some important details, but;

When was Altair's apple ever designated as the "Second" Apple? Where is the evidence that the same apple sitting at the bottom of Masyaf is the same one that Elizabeth used? How could they have even gotten it out of the Library in the first place?


67.180.15.208 15:39, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Most of the information about the Apples of Eden was gained from the glyphs in ACII. They labeled the Apples with their numbers. Also, as to how it was recovered from the library: more modern technology would have been one of the many possibilities to penetrate it. Nesty Contact me! 16:15, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Alan Rikkin's email in the first Assassin's Creed calls Altaïr's Apple the "no. 2" and Elizabeth's Apple is called Piece of Eden #2 in the Glyphs in Assassin's Creed II. -- Master Sima Yi 18:59, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

missing Owner?/edit deletion

My friends and I find it highly unlikely that the second apple could ever find its way into the hands of mahatma ghandi without someone bringing it to india. can somebody look at Geop's analysis of the apples of eden and find a reason why I can't add that the apple was probably owned by the East india Trading company before it got to ghandi? The analysis. skip to 10:00 . seriously, I'd like a reasonable explination, because my last edit was reverted without reason given. 98.18.48.41 19:52, June 3, 2012 (UTC)