Talk:Adam and Eve

Is it not Eve that says 'Adam, I've got it' and Adam that then says 'Eve, look out!'? --143.53.152.67 19:07, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Unless adam Has a Girly voice.... NO "Adam I have it" - (Eve) "Eve" - (Adam) "Look out!" - (Eve)

Someone's changed it to what I wrote (not me). Just thought I'd point it out.--143.53.152.67 08:07, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

Biblical

Ya know I find it funny how Christianity hasn't realized the one thing that can undo their religion: The Garden Of Eden. Think about it: God planted the Garden on Earth, He created Man and Woman and all living things within it, Adam and Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge, God banishes them from the Garden and puts a cherub at the door to guard it. So why has the Garden not been found in all the years of people exploring the planet? If a cherub is placed at the door surely someone would have seen it. God never said they couldn't look at the Garden or anything just that they are banished from entering it so therefore Christianity has a major loophole thus making it undone.--125.238.72.227 13:21, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

The Garden could have dissapeared or growed since the initial conception. And this is a sensitive subject, everyone who enters it, keep it low. It will be watched and may be deleted at any moment if needed be. -- D. Cello 16:31, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Ya know I find if funny how the questioner hasn't realized the one thing that can answer his question: The Flood. Think about it: God sends a massive flood to destroy most life on earth, chances are that the garden would be destroyed and many of the earths features changed to make finding what might have survived nearly impossible. I'm having a bit of fun with your challenge, but seriously, whether you agree or disagree with the Bible, you should take the whole system into account when you attempt a disproof. I suspect you will find most who hold Gen. 1-3 to be historical also hold the rest of Genesis as historical. Also, I love the jump from something having a loophole to it being false or undone. You know, tax codes also have loopholes, I guess I don't have to pay taxes! :) 72.94.254.212 21:34, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep it low, emotions at bay. And your theory makes sense. -- D. Cello 01:26, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Markings on their skin

Another important point, I was watching the Truth video today, I have downloaded it in HD so was watching it carefully. I'm pretty certain that the markings on the bodies of Adam and Eve etc are suits, and not their actual skin. When you see Eve turning to say she has the Apple, you can see quite clearly a line across her neck where the 'shiny' glazed look of their body, and the markings, stops. It would also explain why their private areas are also covered. I'm sure I can take screen shots for this if anyone wants them - Maria Thorpe Feb 25 2010 18.02 (UTC)

I remember seeing this somewhere, I believe it was in one of Zwooosh's pictures. Yeas, they are clearly suits and not markings. But why was this brought up? oO -- D. Cello 00:57, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Because the article implies that it is not a suit, that's why I thought it should be mentioned Maria Thorpe Feb 27 2010 03.20 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Didn't knew that. =x
Go ahead and change it, then! ;D -- D. Cello 05:19, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Slaves?

I believe that's a bit of a liberal interpretation. The game doesn't make this clear, nor the reasons behind the rebellion, so without actual proof, I think it's a little strong to name it a master/slave relationship. http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/fallout/images/0/08/Personal_Sig_Image.gif _Tagaziel ^(call!) 20:59, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. -- D. Cello 21:46, April 11, 2010 (UTC)