Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-18014300-20200527214426/@comment-30719293-20200702064931: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Lacrossedeamon
Created page with "So this is a really nit picky thing but I think while etymology for fictional characters belongs in BtS because it’s part of the OoU conception I think etymology for histori..."
 
m Text replacement - "’" to "'"
 
Line 1: Line 1:
So this is a really nit picky thing but I think while etymology for fictional characters belongs in BtS because it’s part of the OoU conception I think etymology for historical characters is actually IU. And I guess the strict etymology of fictional characters would be IU as well with only the reasoning behind the developers choosing that name being OoU. I’m wondering if we can put an etymology section as either the first or last IU section in an article?
So this is a really nit picky thing but I think while etymology for fictional characters belongs in BtS because it's part of the OoU conception I think etymology for historical characters is actually IU. And I guess the strict etymology of fictional characters would be IU as well with only the reasoning behind the developers choosing that name being OoU. I'm wondering if we can put an etymology section as either the first or last IU section in an article?

Latest revision as of 00:10, 12 August 2026

So this is a really nit picky thing but I think while etymology for fictional characters belongs in BtS because it's part of the OoU conception I think etymology for historical characters is actually IU. And I guess the strict etymology of fictional characters would be IU as well with only the reasoning behind the developers choosing that name being OoU. I'm wondering if we can put an etymology section as either the first or last IU section in an article?