Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Category talk:Assassins: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Lacrossedeamon Created page with "===Occupational Assassin’s=== Since all members of the Assassin Brotherhood already fall under their respective branches should this category be opened up to all who’ve ki..." |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | |||
==Occupational Assassin's== | |||
Since all members of the Assassin Brotherhood already fall under their respective branches should this category be opened up to all who’ve killed for political, religious, or ideological reasons regardless of affiliation? John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald are both famous assassins but have so far been excluded form this category. I’d move this page to fall under individuals by occupation and have all current subcategories here fall directly under the Assassin Brotherhood category. Not all keener fonthe Brotherhood would qualify for this category, only thus that have for certain engaged in an assassination. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 19:35, June 27, 2018 (UTC) | Since all members of the Assassin Brotherhood already fall under their respective branches should this category be opened up to all who’ve killed for political, religious, or ideological reasons regardless of affiliation? John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald are both famous assassins but have so far been excluded form this category. I’d move this page to fall under individuals by occupation and have all current subcategories here fall directly under the Assassin Brotherhood category. Not all keener fonthe Brotherhood would qualify for this category, only thus that have for certain engaged in an assassination. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 19:35, June 27, 2018 (UTC) | ||
:I'm pretty sure we've debated this before somewhere, but it's not on this page somehow. I understand that your position is that we should have a category of assassins with a lower-case ⟨A⟩ for individuals like John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald, but you have to understand that a great deal of Assassins and Templars alike were also assassins. Realistically, there Booth, Oswald, Assassins, and Templars are all assassins, and the only way the former two seem more "assassin" than the latter two is because they are historical figures. Under no logic can we have a plain category for assassins and not include all the other fictional characters we know to be or have acted as assassins. And I think I remember you didn't want such a category to include Assassin and Templar assassins. | |||
:So my proposal is this: either we change this category to including all assassins, historical and fictional and retain "Category:Assassin Brotherhood members", or we don't have this category in which case there's no need for disambguation and all pages from "Category:Assassin Brotherhood members" should be moved back here for conciseness. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:59, May 30, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:59, 30 May 2020
Occupational Assassin's
Since all members of the Assassin Brotherhood already fall under their respective branches should this category be opened up to all who’ve killed for political, religious, or ideological reasons regardless of affiliation? John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald are both famous assassins but have so far been excluded form this category. I’d move this page to fall under individuals by occupation and have all current subcategories here fall directly under the Assassin Brotherhood category. Not all keener fonthe Brotherhood would qualify for this category, only thus that have for certain engaged in an assassination. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 19:35, June 27, 2018 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure we've debated this before somewhere, but it's not on this page somehow. I understand that your position is that we should have a category of assassins with a lower-case ⟨A⟩ for individuals like John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald, but you have to understand that a great deal of Assassins and Templars alike were also assassins. Realistically, there Booth, Oswald, Assassins, and Templars are all assassins, and the only way the former two seem more "assassin" than the latter two is because they are historical figures. Under no logic can we have a plain category for assassins and not include all the other fictional characters we know to be or have acted as assassins. And I think I remember you didn't want such a category to include Assassin and Templar assassins.
- So my proposal is this: either we change this category to including all assassins, historical and fictional and retain "Category:Assassin Brotherhood members", or we don't have this category in which case there's no need for disambguation and all pages from "Category:Assassin Brotherhood members" should be moved back here for conciseness. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 15:59, May 30, 2020 (UTC)