Talk:Sage: Difference between revisions
imported>Jasca Ducato mNo edit summary |
imported>Kainzorus Prime No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Did the assassins and templars of the time (late 17th/early 18th century) know that sages were incarnations of the precursor civilization member Aita? Kenway clearly had no idea what was going on with roberts in the observatory. Also did the people of abstergo entertainment know what was up with John in terms of him being Aita? [[User:Gr1m r4p3r|Gr1m r4p3r]] ([[User talk:Gr1m r4p3r|talk]]) 14:34, January 17, 2014 (UTC) | Did the assassins and templars of the time (late 17th/early 18th century) know that sages were incarnations of the precursor civilization member Aita? Kenway clearly had no idea what was going on with roberts in the observatory. Also did the people of abstergo entertainment know what was up with John in terms of him being Aita? [[User:Gr1m r4p3r|Gr1m r4p3r]] ([[User talk:Gr1m r4p3r|talk]]) 14:34, January 17, 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Kenway wasn't an Assassin or Templar at the time. But to answer your question, no. No, they did not know they were reincarnations of Aita; only that they possessed knowledge of the location of the Observatory, and the means to access it. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 14:39, January 17, 2014 (UTC) | :Kenway wasn't an Assassin or Templar at the time. But to answer your question, no. No, they did not know they were reincarnations of Aita; only that they possessed knowledge of the location of the Observatory, and the means to access it. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])</small> 14:39, January 17, 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Roberts clearly knew he was a reincarnation - vide his dying words. --[[User:Kainzorus Prime|<font color="#7575DB" face="OCR A" size="3">Kainzorus Prime</font>]] [[User talk:Kainzorus Prime|<font color="#4C99A6"><sup>Walkie-talkie</sup></font>]] 17:06, January 17, 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:06, 17 January 2014
If Sages are reincarnations of Aita doesn't that mean there can only be one incarnation at any given time period? How can Thom Kavanaugh (1652 - 1700s) and John Bartholomew Roberts (17 May 1682 – 10 February 1722) coexist? Bartlmay (talk) 15:33, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
How can they not be? They have the memories and personality of Aita in addition to their own imprinted in their being. -- Master Sima Yi Talk 15:36, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
- I think 'reincarnation' is an iffy term for what the Sages are, but there's nothing that says reincarnations have to be consecutive, rather than concurrent. Indeed, given that two of the three known Sages lived at the same time, it's actually more likely that another Sage is alive in 2013, than not. --Jasca Ducato Council Chamber Assassination record 12:06, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
This article is riddled with assumptions. The Grand Llama (talk) 23:44, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
Did the assassins and templars of the time (late 17th/early 18th century) know that sages were incarnations of the precursor civilization member Aita? Kenway clearly had no idea what was going on with roberts in the observatory. Also did the people of abstergo entertainment know what was up with John in terms of him being Aita? Gr1m r4p3r (talk) 14:34, January 17, 2014 (UTC)
- Kenway wasn't an Assassin or Templar at the time. But to answer your question, no. No, they did not know they were reincarnations of Aita; only that they possessed knowledge of the location of the Observatory, and the means to access it. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 14:39, January 17, 2014 (UTC)
- Roberts clearly knew he was a reincarnation - vide his dying words. --Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 17:06, January 17, 2014 (UTC)