Talk:John Pitcairn

Ordered?

was connor actually ordered, from the footage we see them talking and parts of the assassination, but do we know that he was ordered by putnam, couldnt he have just been getting information or informing putnam of his intentions against the templar. Aegritudo (talk) 01:00, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

If you follow the source link, you'll see that the info comes from an article written by someone who went to PAX East and actually saw the demo. The only thing we saw were a couple of images and some short clips of the demo. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 01:48, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

nice, how come this demo hasnt been released as the others have? ('cept parts in gameplay trailers) Aegritudo (talk) 04:15, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

Sign your posts Aegritudo..The demo shown in PAX East was exclusively for that show only and so it was never intended to be released later. Only a few images were leaked I think.--Odranoelluta^{Talk✲<choose><option>http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel-cinematic-universe/images/1/18/Sig.png</option></choose>} 04:05, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

bit of a bummer for those who could never go, just have to wait till release tho i guess. (about the signing, thats what lack of sleep does, fixed now). Aegritudo (talk) 04:15, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

I don't think he was ordered, and I have played the game. In fact, Connor had to ask how to flush Pitcairn out, and then ignored Putnam saying trying to go out there was suicide. This was Connor's idea, I will write a formal bio in a second too. EmeraldCorruption (talk) 19:13, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

TheSolidAssassin(formally Assassin31) I'm gonna replay sequence 7 on ACIII so that I can finish filling in all the information on and the Work for the Templars section sometime this week. Also thanks to whoever added the links and improved some of the sentences.

Factual correction

Never in history nor the game is John Pitcairn referred to as "Jonathan Pitcairn" as the title and page states. I am going to change all instances of Jonathan Pitcairn to John Pitcairn.Martin Christopher Adamian (talk) 04:49, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to disappoint you, but Haytham refers to him as Jonathan in Infiltrating Southgate. Stormbeast ♉ ^{The Helpful Place} 05:12, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Yes but shouldn't we at least state that it is a historical innaccuracy? It could just be an error on the developers' part. Also I'm fairly sure that the animus database refers to him as John Pitcairn, not Jonathan "John" Pitcairn.--Martin Christopher Adamian (talk) 01:28, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

The guy's right. This could be stated as a historical inaccuracy, as there is no real source mentioning him as a Jonathan. '

EDIT: Although the Wikipedia page for the name John states that John is often misunderstood to be short for Jonathan. Ubi could simply have been playing off the idea, or they could have misunderstood the name too. -- IlMualim ^{Wanna Chat?} 05:05, March 2, 2013 (UTC)