Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Talk:Great Catastrophe: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SkytowerC →AC:I Timeline: new section |
imported>SkytowerC |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== AC:I Timeline == | == AC:I Timeline == | ||
Would the new AC:Initiates timeline be a suitable referance for dates? | Would the new AC:Initiates timeline be a suitable referance for dates?[[User:SkytowerC|SkytowerC]] ([[User talk:SkytowerC|talk]]) 01:51, October 6, 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:51, 6 October 2012
Merge With 1st Disaster?
Should this article be merged with the First Disaster article? I think they both refer to the same thing, and they're both short enough to be combined. Smoke3723 00:29, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
- I just updated and slightly expanded the article, but I agree that it should probably be merged into the First Disaster article based on Revelations. It could simply be a sentence with a link to the Wikipedia article, such as, "Subject 16 suggested that the First Disaster had been incorrectly attributed to the Toba volcanic supereruption, which occurred 77,000-69,000 years ago and supposedly induced climate change that reduced the worldwide human population to less than 10,000 individuals." —Helmandsare 09:38, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. --Alientraveller 17:48, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
AC:I Timeline
Would the new AC:Initiates timeline be a suitable referance for dates?SkytowerC (talk) 01:51, October 6, 2012 (UTC)