Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Talk:Arno's Set: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Lacrossedeamon |
imported>Lacrossedeamon |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | {{Talkheader}} | ||
==Poor name== | ==Poor name== | ||
{{OpenTalk}} | |||
I came across this when I saw "[[Arno Dorian's robes]]" marked for deletion. If the title of this is actually conjectural, then I would argue "Arno Dorian's robes" is a much better name than "Arno's Set". First, it is better to use his first and last name together. Second, "set of what"? Third, "set" grammatically should not be capitalized and neither should it be for all the other armor sets. I understand that it was probably named this was to be consistent with how we currently have the other armor sets named, but if the name is conjectural, I argue that it is better to have the clear name. In any case, "Arno Dorian's robes" should at least be a redirect and not deleted. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC) | I came across this when I saw "[[Arno Dorian's robes]]" marked for deletion. If the title of this is actually conjectural, then I would argue "Arno Dorian's robes" is a much better name than "Arno's Set". First, it is better to use his first and last name together. Second, "set of what"? Third, "set" grammatically should not be capitalized and neither should it be for all the other armor sets. I understand that it was probably named this was to be consistent with how we currently have the other armor sets named, but if the name is conjectural, I argue that it is better to have the clear name. In any case, "Arno Dorian's robes" should at least be a redirect and not deleted. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
:This reminds me; I want to revisit the game's outfits vs the character's outfits discussion. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 07:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC) | :This reminds me; I want to revisit the game's outfits vs the character's outfits discussion. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 07:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Regardless of my above comment I do think '''Arno Dorian's robes (or outfit)''' is the better name. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 07:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 19 July 2024
Poor name[edit source]
This is an ongoing discussion.I came across this when I saw "Arno Dorian's robes" marked for deletion. If the title of this is actually conjectural, then I would argue "Arno Dorian's robes" is a much better name than "Arno's Set". First, it is better to use his first and last name together. Second, "set of what"? Third, "set" grammatically should not be capitalized and neither should it be for all the other armor sets. I understand that it was probably named this was to be consistent with how we currently have the other armor sets named, but if the name is conjectural, I argue that it is better to have the clear name. In any case, "Arno Dorian's robes" should at least be a redirect and not deleted. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 06:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- This reminds me; I want to revisit the game's outfits vs the character's outfits discussion. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless of my above comment I do think Arno Dorian's robes (or outfit) is the better name. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 07:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)