Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-24227780-20170906223050/@comment-18014300-20171022225434: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "<div class="quote">Slate Vesper wrote:<br />The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To cal..." |
m Text replacement - "<br />" to "<br>" |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote">Slate Vesper wrote:<br | <div class="quote">Slate Vesper wrote:<br>The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To call one character "historical" or "real" would only serve to diminish the value of other such "non-historical" characters, even if they play a more important role in the games. | ||
In this regard, ''everyone'' detailed in this universe is a character in their own right and everyone in the series should be treated equally and based on their own merits, fictional or factual. | In this regard, ''everyone'' detailed in this universe is a character in their own right and everyone in the series should be treated equally and based on their own merits, fictional or factual. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
That's a very interesting and fresh perspective of looking at it I never would have thought of. I'm not sure I agree, but I do think it's quite profound.<br | That's a very interesting and fresh perspective of looking at it I never would have thought of. I'm not sure I agree, but I do think it's quite profound.<br> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:12, 13 July 2026
Slate Vesper wrote:
The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To call one character "historical" or "real" would only serve to diminish the value of other such "non-historical" characters, even if they play a more important role in the games.
The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To call one character "historical" or "real" would only serve to diminish the value of other such "non-historical" characters, even if they play a more important role in the games.
In this regard, everyone detailed in this universe is a character in their own right and everyone in the series should be treated equally and based on their own merits, fictional or factual.
That's a very interesting and fresh perspective of looking at it I never would have thought of. I'm not sure I agree, but I do think it's quite profound.