Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Board Thread:Assassin's Creed general discussion/@comment-26314858-20150714112803/@comment-26986086-20170726131459: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Callum Konstantin
No edit summary
imported>Callum Konstantin
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Based on all of this...It seems that no true anser exists...does it?
It does tick me off that all these theories seem far too obvious to be true. Based on all of this...It seems that no true anser exists...does it? Or maybe we are theorizing and stating facts without sufficient data....much like how we dont have enough clay to create bricks. 


Or maybe we are theorizing and stating facts without sufficient data....much like how we dont have enough clay to create bricks. 
We need more data...perhaps the Father of Understanding was a metaphoric being or an Isu being or a human being or even an Isu's own World Religion's god....Either way it seems that we dont have sufficient data to prove any theory right now...regardless how likely the theories are.


We need more data...perhaps the Father of Understanding was a metaphoric being or an Isu being or a human being or even an Isu's own god....
Though they all are quite tempting and all of them... the Father of Understanding being a human, Isu, other higher magical being or just a concept....seem too likely to be true...  
 
Either way it seems that we dont have sufficient data to prove any theory right now...regardless how likely the theories are.
 
Though they all are quite tempting and all of them... the Father of Understanding being a human, Isu, other higher magical being or just a concept....seem too likely to be true...
 
But it does tick me off that all these theories seem far too obvious to be true.  

Latest revision as of 15:21, 26 July 2017

It does tick me off that all these theories seem far too obvious to be true. Based on all of this...It seems that no true anser exists...does it? Or maybe we are theorizing and stating facts without sufficient data....much like how we dont have enough clay to create bricks. 

We need more data...perhaps the Father of Understanding was a metaphoric being or an Isu being or a human being or even an Isu's own World Religion's god....Either way it seems that we dont have sufficient data to prove any theory right now...regardless how likely the theories are.

Though they all are quite tempting and all of them... the Father of Understanding being a human, Isu, other higher magical being or just a concept....seem too likely to be true...