User blog comment:The Grand Llama/Losing Luster/@comment-4374396-20131113190941

I don't know, I liked ACIII the first time I played it, I think it was a nice change of pace, they did try something different with the frontier and all. And I think Connor was misunderstood as a character, I like the fact that he's always serious and that it's always black or white with him, I think that's what they were going for. You can see another side of him with the Homstead missions.

I think ACR is the weakest one in the AC Franchise, but I still enjoyed it at the time. Not as much as the others ACs, but still.

ACB when it came out, I hated it because it was not as good as ACII. But over the time, and after replaying it a few times, I really liked it (although the story is weak).

ACII... well, ACII is ACII. I think I started my 33th or 34th playthrough a month ago, it just tells you how much I enjoy this game, even 4 years after.

When they announced ACIVBF, I have to say, I started to think "OK AC, you have to slow down now" and I did not even follow all the promotion like I did with previous ACs. I bought the game and I was surprised with how much fun I had, the game has flaws don't get me wrong (too many eavesdropping mission in my opinion) but the overall experience is a really robust AC. I think it's safe to say it's the second best AC game.