Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User blog comment:Jasca Ducato/Assassin's Creed III - My Review (Xbox 360)/@comment-189.121.177.240-20121128220011

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Revision as of 00:00, 29 November 2012 by 189.121.177.240 (Sọ̀rọ̀) (Created page with "The game has awseome gameplay, a ton of side missions and it is visually stunning... But damn.. the ending.. I WANTED CONCLUSIONS.. they destroyed it... Tell me, is Desmond ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The game has awseome gameplay, a ton of side missions and it is visually stunning...

But damn.. the ending.. I WANTED CONCLUSIONS.. they destroyed it...

Tell me, is Desmond dead? Is his conscience alive inside the Temples' walls? How did Juno actually became the ruler of the world? What was the tool Juno used to stop the solar flare?? The whole point of the game was to discover how it could be stopped, but then... just credits... with fucking shitloads of names that you can't skip..

Oh but here's the biggest story screw-up for me.... WHY did Minerva told all that to Desmond (through Ezio) in AC2, about locating the Temples to save the Earth if at the end of the day SHE DIDN'T WANT DESMOND TO DO ANYTHING?? She should just shut up, then..

And well, theres' the usual.. too much time with Haytham... lack of references to Altair and Ezio (just saying their names once in the whole game doesn't count, sorry).. poor Daniel Cross fight... and as I feared, it was an "America, fuck yeah" game afterall. All his targets were brittish and he canonically hunts blue-coats ONCE in the game's main story. They made Connor naive enough to be the Patriots' bitch even after knowing they were attacking his people...