Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Thread:Vatsa1708/@comment-3235544-20111104061338

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Revision as of 08:13, 4 November 2011 by imported>Il Lupo (Created page with "Hello, Vatsa. I'd like to draw your attention to the flurry of articles you made 'FA' earlier. Now, I admit that some of those by all rights should have been made FA because they...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, Vatsa. I'd like to draw your attention to the flurry of articles you made 'FA' earlier. Now, I admit that some of those by all rights should have been made FA because they passed all standards and were voted in properly, but a couple of articles such as the 'Templars' article still had negative voters. Your positive ending of the voting process goes against this rule: 5.Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Istruttore supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article." As such, it may not have been a good idea to have ended the voting process for it. What do you think?<ac_metadata title="FA Articles"> </ac_metadata>