Talk:Assassin's Creed III

This is the discussion page for Assassin's Creed III. Here, you may discuss improving the article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Be polite Assume good faith Do not insult other people

Archive 1 (December 14, 2009 - January 21, 2012)

Archive 2 (January 21, 2012 - August 01, 2012)

PC release date confirmation

PC release date is October 30 on the amazon preorder site. (Arabian411269 (talk) 22:42, August 2, 2012 (UTC))

Ubisoft releasing the PC version a day earlier than the consoles? What universe does this amazon exist? --VATSA (TALK • GENTEK) 03:17, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Lol. Totally get your point (though it pains me) (Arabian411269 (talk) 13:50, August 3, 2012 (UTC))

isnt the US release the 30th? amazon has probably just got that date as tentative and it would change if they get more info. Ægritudo _Talk 05:30, August 3, 2012

I doubt they'll just change it. Any change in delivery dates is a breach of contract unless they have a disclaimer or something. (Arabian411269 (talk) 13:50, August 3, 2012 (UTC))

any date(or other info for that mater) that they have for preorders/unreleased product is subject to change, if ubi pushes back the release date this change will reflect on the amazon page, they will garantee the price you pay wont go up on your preorder tho. Ægritudo _Talk 14:51, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

bad news: http://www.examiner.com/article/assassin-s-creed-3-gets-delayed-for-pc-until-november-as-expected

ACsenior (talk) 08:32, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, shit. (Arabian411269 (talk) 01:39, August 12, 2012 (UTC))

New Screenshots

I found these new screenshots on kotaku. (Arabian411269 (talk) 12:16, August 15, 2012 (UTC))

{C {C}{C Should we put them In AC 3 page, and have you sourced them??AnsweratioN ^{Coffee Maybe?}_{Wisdom words} 12:27, August 15, 2012 (UTC)

They're good quality images so I don't see why not. Source them and you're good to go. ~ GI Auditore ^{Comms Channel} 13:14, August 15, 2012 (UTC)

none of these three are sourced, do they really add anything to the article? should also be asked before adding them. Ægritudo _Talk 13:15, August 15, 2012 (UTC)

I did a bit of digging and sourced the images. Thanks for noting they were from kotaku, made the whole thing a lot easier. We can go ahead and use them for the articles now, seeing as they are of good quality and could be useful for certain sections. ~ GI Auditore ^{Comms Channel} 13:47, August 15, 2012 (UTC)

Glad I could help. (Arabian411269 (talk) 14:16, August 15, 2012 (UTC))

Criticisms

So I was looking through the Criticisms section and I noticed there's only room for one image there (otherwise it looks bad). Now I'm wondering, which image would be better suited for the section? We could go with Connor assassinating a Continental (pictured on the section above) to show the outcome, or we could go with him killing Redcoats (currently used, pictured on the right), showing the cause. What does everyone else think? ~ GI Auditore ^{Comms Channel} 08:11, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

I say put the one where he kills a Continental soldier. The Redcoat picture reinforces the rumor and misrepresents the game since almost EVER other picture on the wikia shows him killing Redcoats. Plus it looks better, just sayin. (Arabian411269 (talk) 13:30, August 17, 2012 (UTC)).

Agree we shuld take the one where he kills a continental solider.--ACsenior (talk) 13:43, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

I would go the other way and say leave the redcoats, simply because it does display the subject of criticism. Ægritudo _Talk 13:47, August 17, 2012 (UTC)