Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User blog comment:The.Outsider/Daniel's Part In AC3/ Templars & Assassins Argument/@comment-4361160-20120924220551

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Revision as of 00:05, 25 September 2012 by imported>Rotionpotion (Created page with "I read the bottom part and I think you are stretching the events to make it look like the Assassns are evil. The assassin order only kills those that kill others and prevent t...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I read the bottom part and I think you are stretching the events to make it look like the Assassns are evil. The assassin order only kills those that kill others and prevent the people from exercising free will. Yusuf died fighting Templars. If your talking about Revelation's arsenal, yes Ezio instigated the riot, but it was already instigated and the people could've chose not to riot if they didn't want to. As for Tarik, accidents happen. I'm not sure how bad Derinkuyu was, considering guards were willing to stay. I agree with you on Nikolai, although it conflicts with history; Giovanni Borgia was taken in by the Assassins even though his mother was a borgia of course, and his father betrayed and murdered several assassins

Retrieved from ‘https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_blog_comment:The.Outsider/Daniel%27s_Part_In_AC3/_Templars_%26_Assassins_Argument/@comment-4361160-20120924220551&oldid=1031399’