Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

User blog comment:Serpentaxy400/Is Ubisoft Milking the Franchise?/@comment-1153722-20130301004610/@comment-2142534-20130311150552

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Revision as of 17:05, 11 March 2013 by imported>BRX (Created page with "I'm glad someone said it the way Sima did. Also, I don't understand why people think AC3 had a bad storyline. It's one of the best in all the games I played. It's also the fi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'm glad someone said it the way Sima did.

Also, I don't understand why people think AC3 had a bad storyline. It's one of the best in all the games I played. It's also the first game to make you really wonder who's right, Assassins or Templars. AC1 and Revelations tried doing something about Templars being too evil, but didn't really succeed. It has happened very often that I don't agree with Connor. Speaking of Connor, he's a very well done character. I don't see any reason in complaining how he is emotionless. He is definately the most caring character of the playable ones in all the series. The ending of the story is unique. Connor does what he wanted to do all the time, kill Charles Lee, but at the same time he finds out that killing Charles Lee shouldn't have been his primary goal, and that bad things happened while he was trying to get to Lee, so it's neither a happy nor a sad ending.

As for the gameplay, I got nothing to say about it. It's pretty obvious that this part of the game isn't being 'milked'.

Retrieved from ‘https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_blog_comment:Serpentaxy400/Is_Ubisoft_Milking_the_Franchise%3F/@comment-1153722-20130301004610/@comment-2142534-20130311150552&oldid=1022647’