Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-84037-20170106215439/@comment-18014300-20170616192655: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "I was checking out the Appearances box or media in ''Assassin's Creed: Origins'', and I notice that you seem to have taken it directly from Wookieepedia without really ada..." |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was checking out the Appearances box or media in ''[[Assassin's Creed: Origins]]'', and I notice that you seem to have taken it directly from Wookieepedia without really adapting it to ''Assassin's Creed'. For example, I'm not quite sure we should have a "vehicles and vessels" section... though it maybe in a World War setting or the like, it is needed (if we actually have an article on the tanks and war planes). Also, we have both a "creatures" section and a "species" section, with all animals being placed under "species" anyways, not creatures. I see that you changed "Sentient Species" to just "Species". Since this isn't ''Star Wars'', it is fine to consolidate all animals under one category: species, and "creatures" (which Wookieepedia decided is the scientifically correct term for non-<s>sentient</s>''sapient'' animals) can be removed. After all, we only have two sapient species: Isu and human. | I was checking out the Appearances box or media in ''[[Assassin's Creed: Origins]]'', and I notice that you seem to have taken it directly from Wookieepedia without really adapting it to ''Assassin's Creed''. For example, I'm not quite sure we should have a "vehicles and vessels" section... though it maybe in a World War setting or the like, it is needed (if we actually have an article on the tanks and war planes). Also, we have both a "creatures" section and a "species" section, with all animals being placed under "species" anyways, not creatures. I see that you changed "Sentient Species" to just "Species". Since this isn't ''Star Wars'', it is fine to consolidate all animals under one category: species, and "creatures" (which Wookieepedia decided is the scientifically correct term for non-<s>sentient</s>''sapient'' animals) can be removed. After all, we only have two sapient species: Isu and human.'' | ||
Latest revision as of 21:27, 16 June 2017
I was checking out the Appearances box or media in Assassin's Creed: Origins, and I notice that you seem to have taken it directly from Wookieepedia without really adapting it to Assassin's Creed. For example, I'm not quite sure we should have a "vehicles and vessels" section... though it maybe in a World War setting or the like, it is needed (if we actually have an article on the tanks and war planes). Also, we have both a "creatures" section and a "species" section, with all animals being placed under "species" anyways, not creatures. I see that you changed "Sentient Species" to just "Species". Since this isn't Star Wars, it is fine to consolidate all animals under one category: species, and "creatures" (which Wookieepedia decided is the scientifically correct term for non-sentientsapient animals) can be removed. After all, we only have two sapient species: Isu and human.