Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-28601337-20160602221928/@comment-18014300-20170727215930: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I disagree that either are actually cults, but I suppose that's rather subjective. I also think you seem to be harking back to the freedom vs. order dichotomy which is a false binary at the source of so | I disagree that either are actually cults, but I suppose that's rather subjective. I also think you seem to be harking back to the freedom vs. order dichotomy which is a false binary at the source of so many misinterpretations of both factions. | ||
In any case, I think you're diverging from the topic of the thread which isn't about whether either side is good or bad, but whether the Templars have ever been good, or whether the Templars are always bad ''in comparison'' to the Assassins, whether or not the Assassins are bad as well. | In any case, I think you're diverging from the topic of the thread which isn't about whether either side is good or bad, but whether the Templars have ever been good, or whether the Templars are always bad ''in comparison'' to the Assassins, whether or not the Assassins are bad as well. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:59, 27 July 2017
I disagree that either are actually cults, but I suppose that's rather subjective. I also think you seem to be harking back to the freedom vs. order dichotomy which is a false binary at the source of so many misinterpretations of both factions.
In any case, I think you're diverging from the topic of the thread which isn't about whether either side is good or bad, but whether the Templars have ever been good, or whether the Templars are always bad in comparison to the Assassins, whether or not the Assassins are bad as well.