Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
User talk:Whitefire1337: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Master Sima Yi →Assassins: new section |
imported>Sol Pacificus |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I had already undone your re-adding all these other Assassins to the notable members list with a message to tell you to read the talk page, yet you added them again. I'd therefore like to direct you to [[Talk:Assassins]] before readding them a third time. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 23:03, September 10, 2017 (UTC) | I had already undone your re-adding all these other Assassins to the notable members list with a message to tell you to read the talk page, yet you added them again. I'd therefore like to direct you to [[Talk:Assassins]] before readding them a third time. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 23:03, September 10, 2017 (UTC) | ||
As Master Sima Yi already informed you above, we already have threads in place in the talk page to invite people such as yourself, who disagree with the edits, to voice and debate them freely. This is also meant to prevent counter-productive edit warring. If there is an ongoing discussion about the direction of a page, you should not be continuing to revert edits. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 14:32, October 2, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:32, 2 October 2017
Assassins[edit source]
I had already undone your re-adding all these other Assassins to the notable members list with a message to tell you to read the talk page, yet you added them again. I'd therefore like to direct you to Talk:Assassins before readding them a third time. -- Master Sima Yi Talk 23:03, September 10, 2017 (UTC)
As Master Sima Yi already informed you above, we already have threads in place in the talk page to invite people such as yourself, who disagree with the edits, to voice and debate them freely. This is also meant to prevent counter-productive edit warring. If there is an ongoing discussion about the direction of a page, you should not be continuing to revert edits. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 14:32, October 2, 2017 (UTC)