User talk:Francesco75: Difference between revisions
imported>Francesco75 |
imported>Sol Pacificus →RE:Damascus reverted: new section |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:Regular editors cannot delete images, but I can do it for you :) Thank you for the quick response and sourcing all your images! {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 18:18, August 27, 2016 (UTC) | :Regular editors cannot delete images, but I can do it for you :) Thank you for the quick response and sourcing all your images! {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 18:18, August 27, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Thank you :) [[User:Francesco75|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75|talk]]) 05:18, August 28, 2016 (UTC) | :Thank you :) [[User:Francesco75|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75|talk]]) 05:18, August 28, 2016 (UTC) | ||
== RE:Damascus reverted == | |||
Hey Francesco, I apologize for not explaining it; when undoing multiple edits, I have to use the rollback function which does not allow an edit summary, and I'm beginning to realize that in such scenarios, I should really leave a direct message to the user clarifying the revert. | |||
The reason why I reverted it is because some staff disapprove of the addition of these kinds of information on infobox because it draws too much from real-life sources(especially the dates), are therefore never cited, and also creates a huge mess. Listing regimes in such a manner always seem to rely heavily on original research. Moreover, there isn't an adequate distinction between the "Sovereign state" parameter and the "ruling body" parameter. The latter has conventionally been used to simply list the preceding sovereign governments rather than the actual ruling body (i.e. administration) of the location. Hence, the infobox really must be revised, and in the meantime, we should probably refrain from continuing to use the parameter or at least not in this way. | |||
I thank you so much for contacting me about this because I realize that it was my mistake that I didn't bother taking the initiative to explain it to you. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 08:18, June 27, 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:18, 27 June 2018
Welcome to the Order, Francesco75! |
Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki!
We hope you enjoy your stay, and we look forward to working with you! |
| Have you something to say? |
|
We seek unity, stability and order. |
|
| We wish you safety and peace on your future endeavors. Happy Editing! |
Feel free to contact me on my talkpage if you need anything. -- Vatsa1708 (Talk) 13:36, 2012 October 21
Warning
Stop badgehunting. -- Master Sima Yi Talk 19:39, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
Why I have a warning? Francesco75 (talk) 07:27, October 31, 2012 (UTC)
Sorry :P
Hey
Well, it was my mistake for not contemplating that possibility, keep up those awesome edits. DipsonDP (talk) 00:54, July 22, 2016 (UTC)
Images
Please note that you need to source any and all images you upload to the wiki in accordance to our image policy. For more information on how to source images, check this page. Also check the information about naming images appropriately. Badly named or unsourced images will be deleted. Feel free to reupload your deleted image with proper sourcing. Thank you. Crook The Constantine District 14:12, August 27, 2016 (UTC)
I have reupload all images with the source but I have one to delete because it already exist Moving Mirabeau 2. How I delete it.Francesco75 (talk) 16:48, August 27, 2016 (UTC)
- Regular editors cannot delete images, but I can do it for you :) Thank you for the quick response and sourcing all your images! Crook The Constantine District 18:18, August 27, 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you :) Francesco75 (talk) 05:18, August 28, 2016 (UTC)
RE:Damascus reverted
Hey Francesco, I apologize for not explaining it; when undoing multiple edits, I have to use the rollback function which does not allow an edit summary, and I'm beginning to realize that in such scenarios, I should really leave a direct message to the user clarifying the revert.
The reason why I reverted it is because some staff disapprove of the addition of these kinds of information on infobox because it draws too much from real-life sources(especially the dates), are therefore never cited, and also creates a huge mess. Listing regimes in such a manner always seem to rely heavily on original research. Moreover, there isn't an adequate distinction between the "Sovereign state" parameter and the "ruling body" parameter. The latter has conventionally been used to simply list the preceding sovereign governments rather than the actual ruling body (i.e. administration) of the location. Hence, the infobox really must be revised, and in the meantime, we should probably refrain from continuing to use the parameter or at least not in this way.
I thank you so much for contacting me about this because I realize that it was my mistake that I didn't bother taking the initiative to explain it to you. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 08:18, June 27, 2018 (UTC)

