Talk:Roman Rite of the Templar Order: Difference between revisions
imported>ACsenior No edit summary |
imported>Sol Pacificus m must. fix. all unsigned comments ._. |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==<span style="font-weight:normal;">Roman Rite of the Templar Order</span>== | ==<span style="font-weight:normal;">Roman Rite of the Templar Order</span>== | ||
<span style="font-weight:normal;">Why those Templars was called The Roman Rite of the Templar Order, not Italian Templars?</span> | <span style="font-weight:normal;">Why those Templars was called The Roman Rite of the Templar Order, not Italian Templars?</span> {{unsigned|A.gao.96}} | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 27 January 2017
Can we move this back to Italian Templars? They're never labelled as a Rite, so much as a collection of like-minded individuals. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:57, September 7, 2015 (UTC)
Name
I noticed that in the databse entries for Rodrigo Borgia in AC 2 and Brotherhood have him labled as the leader of the Italian Templars. Just in case that matters, I noticed the page was catagorized as having a conjectural title.Hugues de Payens (talk) 17:33, January 2, 2016 (UTC)
A database written by an Assassin that's not a member of that Rite going against an label of that Rite by the company that owns this series. We never knew the name of the Rite itself, just that there where Italian Templars that worked in Italy during the 15/16 century. Now with The Essential Guide we know the name of the Rite itself rather than naming it after what it's members was, Templars from Italy.--ACsenior (talk) 05:11, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
Roman Rite of the Templar Order
Why those Templars was called The Roman Rite of the Templar Order, not Italian Templars? —unsigned comment by A.gao.96 (talk · contr)