Talk:Koh-i-Noor

About the ring

Do we really know if the diamond on the ring at the end of Brahman actually IS a piece of the Koh-I-Noor? Because it doesn't make sense to make the "Reconstruction scene" at the end if the Koh-I-Noor is already broken and separated in pieces scattered across India in the Present day. Couldn't had just been a reference to the Koh-I-Noor? (The diamond on the ring)

DipsonDP (talk) 22:24, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Two possibilities:

1. the reconstruction scene is a rewind of the footage on the animus and the ring is a shard of the artefact

2. the reconstruction scene is real, the artifact is in fact intact, and the ring is nothing but a ring

Maxattac (talk) 23:09, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

The second one makes more sense

DipsonDP (talk) 23:26, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

• If I remember the scene correctly, the reconstruction scene is displayed on a monitor and not "live", so it's open to interpretation... As readers, there is no definitive answer for us because none of us is in the head of the writer.Maxattac (talk) 23:40, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

• • I checked, and no "the reconstruction scene" is not displayed on a monitor so maybe you are right... but then I don't see the scenaristic utility of showing Jot's ring back to back with the artifact and with the same blue hue in both.Maxattac (talk) 23:59, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Might be best to ask someone who has access to the most recent version of the Encyclopedia. -- Master Sima Yi _Talk 07:10, July 18, 2015 (UTC)

Got my answer!

DipsonDP (talk) 19:29, July 18, 2015 (UTC)

Nice work, Dipson. I hadn't thought of asking Brahman's writers on Twitter. I checked the encyclopedia by the way, which confirms that the Koh-i-Noor "reconstituted" itself following the explosion. Crook ^{The Constantine District} 20:41, July 18, 2015 (UTC)