Talk:Hermeticists: Difference between revisions
imported>Master Sima Yi m moved Talk:Cult of Hermes to Talk:Hermeticists over redirect: I understand the logic in its current name, but I think this is better. People would recognize this name faster and they are called like this in the in-game databas. Plus, we also ... |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Or perhaps they are like the followers of Romulus, and therfore not important in the grand scheme of things. [[User:Beirut|Beirut]] 22:59, February 22, 2011 (UTC) | Or perhaps they are like the followers of Romulus, and therfore not important in the grand scheme of things. [[User:Beirut|Beirut]] 22:59, February 22, 2011 (UTC) | ||
The Followers of Romulous were created by the Templars in control of the church. So they're not another faction. These guys are more like a group some unrealated rich guy put together. They were around for the short term, most likely. | |||
Revision as of 09:58, 21 June 2011
A 3rd Faction
So far we have two factions, the Templars (big on restriction of knowledge and thought to maintain and/or create order) and the Assassins (they desire the free flow of knowledge and unrestricted thought, although using questionable methods to do so). These Hermeticists might be a 3rd faction...with their plan to "transform mankind", let us just say they might be talking literally. Perhaps they were the ones who took Desmond Miles? That remains to be seen since this has yet to be released. Vae Infectus 22:20, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Or perhaps they are like the followers of Romulus, and therfore not important in the grand scheme of things. Beirut 22:59, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
The Followers of Romulous were created by the Templars in control of the church. So they're not another faction. These guys are more like a group some unrealated rich guy put together. They were around for the short term, most likely.