Talk:Helix Initiate: Difference between revisions
imported>Stormbeast mNo edit summary |
imported>Cococrash11 |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Slate's right. "Helix initiate" would be best, same with "Helix research analyst" for ''Rogue''. {{User:Stormbeast/sig}} 21:26, November 22, 2014 (UTC) | Slate's right. "Helix initiate" would be best, same with "Helix research analyst" for ''Rogue''. {{User:Stormbeast/sig}} 21:26, November 22, 2014 (UTC) | ||
Where's the proof that the Protagonist for | Where's the proof that the Protagonist for Rogue is an entirely different character and not the same one from Black Flag. --[[User:Cococrash11|Cococrash11]] ([[User talk:Cococrash11|talk]]) 21:47, November 22, 2014 (UTC) | ||
What's "Rouge"? {{User:Stormbeast/sig}} 21:57, November 22, 2014 (UTC) | What's "Rouge"? {{User:Stormbeast/sig}} 21:57, November 22, 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:07, 23 November 2014
Initiate
Well Abstergo Entertainment research analyst isn't exactly a name like Initiate. --Cococrash11 (talk) 00:00, November 10, 2014 (UTC)
Name
Bishop keeps calling him Initiate or either kid throughout the game and in the ending. So the name is conjecture. --Cococrash11 (talk) 08:07, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the name will always be conjecture, but "Initiate" still doesn't work. I like Slate's idea of "Helix Initiate". Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 02:31, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
Why doesn't it work. Bishop is just Bishop and you didn't think of adding Helix Bishop into it. --Cococrash11 (talk) 03:28, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
- ...Because there's no other "Bishop" in the AC Universe. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 03:34, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
What about Assassin Initiate or is that taken already. --Cococrash11 (talk) 03:35, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
Assassin
Bishop did say if the Initiate watch the Phoenix Project video that mean he joins the Assassins. That would also mean the Initiate is an Assassin. --Cococrash11 (talk) 05:45, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps, but the most predominant feature that they possess is that they were selected as a member of the Helix research/testing group to act as their agent. Even though they soon become involved with the Assassins, "Helix initiate" is a more accessible term. Slate Vesper (talk) 20:49, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
I think the Initiate is the best term since it is short and easy for the readers to find. While article's can have a long name as possible as long it's conjecture but quotes has to be as short as possible that's unfair. --Cococrash11 (talk) 23:53, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
Slate's right. "Helix initiate" would be best, same with "Helix research analyst" for Rogue. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 21:26, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
Where's the proof that the Protagonist for Rogue is an entirely different character and not the same one from Black Flag. --Cococrash11 (talk) 21:47, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
What's "Rouge"? Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 21:57, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
Picture
Should we give him/her a picture?
Awesomekid120 (talk) 21:22, November 22, 2014 (UTC)Awesomekid120
- That's an optional avatar for any Initiate, which actually proves my point that anyone could get the two (Initiates/Initiate) confused. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 21:26, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
There's a difference with Initiate and Initiates. They are not so hard to understand that we need to called it Helix Initiate in order to understand the differences. If that's case why not change Initiates into Helix Initiates from we see in AC Initiates the Initiates are also Helix user. --Cococrash11 (talk) 21:51, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
- You're not making any sense. The Initiates were around before the Helix servers were used. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 21:57, November 22, 2014 (UTC)